I know I'm not the first to bring this up, but the recent recruiting period in Rupp really reminded me of the total lack of control we have here. Obviously these are important information sources at all levels. I only play D2 and D1 at this point, but I've got to imagine it's an issue at D3 as well with the lack of funds for FSS. Even with FSS, scouting trips can help make an educated decision between similar recruits.
How many times do I need a scouting trip to report back that a center with 1 PER has low, average or high potential? Especially considering his ATH, SPD, REB, LP, DEF and SB are in question? I am tired of doing 5-7 scouting trips (I recruit a lot of internationals because of my teams' locations/prestige) and not getting a report on PER, BH and PAS for guards while getting 5 reports on his 1 SB.
If I had an assistant coach report back 5 times on a guards' SB and he didn't report on his PER potential, he would be gone.
I wish it was easy for WIS to implement a selection system for scouting trips. However, since it hasn't happened, it must not be an easy fix for them.
I think there has to be a way to better handle these trips. Something needs to be written into the code where we can select which attributes we want our assistants to scout. If that dumbs it down too much, then assign a minimum arbitrary number of scouting trips to get close to all (or all) the attributes' potential.
Thoughts?