Posted by Iguana1 on 3/4/2012 1:10:00 PM (view original):
I'm the culprit that stooped down for barretchap's recruit.
I often grab a lower ranked recruit to cover in case of Early Entry. I've lost a combined 7 frontcourt players early the past 3 seasons. Last season I ended up with two of my five man rotation up front being filler guys like this. One of the two graduated and the other is a senior, so it's time to bring another one in.
I pegged this guy to end up at least 750, most likely 770, and depending on the cap on those high-highs, possibly 800 (ATH in mid 90's, REB over 70, DEF over 80, LP of 90, B- FT shooter, and BH & PAS both around 50). Even though he is rated in the 180's at PF, my grading had him ranked much closer to 50th.
I also signed the #1 PF. I'd estimate the chances that this low-ranked guy sees more playing time over the course of his career than the #1 (before he bolts Early Entry), at better than 50/50.
Whoa. Are we talking about in Allen?
I wouldn't usually say anything, but I've got a serious problem with this given that your alternate ID happens to be in the same conference as barret,
That's a pretty blatant conflict of interest, in my opinion, and frankly, I don't think you should be recruiting the same geographic area with both your IDs, as it creates an appearance of impropriety.
Sorry, Iguana, but I think that's just plain wrong.