long overdue...User Polls Topic

Godwin's Law is now in effect: first person to mention Hitler in an argument loses.
5/7/2014 8:46 PM
Posted by ettaexpress on 5/7/2014 8:41:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wildcat98 on 5/7/2014 8:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by nickguy08 on 5/7/2014 8:17:00 PM (view original):
I think FSS is to much of a shotgun approach. Going out and scouting players is more rifle approach. I think tiering the FSS service would be ideal. Full cost reveals everything. 2nd grade reveals a little less, 3rd tier just enough to get a good read. There are certain ratings I could care less about.
An example:

You're graduating 2 starters, plus your top sub. In your next class, you need a PG/SG with the potential to start in a couple years, a SF that's versatile enough to back up at the PF right away, and a true C to be your main big sub. You identify 9 players that fit those criteria during the regular season, before recruiting begins. Let's say all are within the 360 mile window that makes scouting trips a lot less expensive, just to make your (in my opinion, very odd) strategy at least a bit more plausible.

If you send out even ONE scouting trip for each of the 9 players, you'll have spent, at minimum, around $1,500. If you follow up with another scouting trip on even 4 or 5 of them, that's probably another $1,000. When you narrow it down to the 3 you're going to offer on, you'll probably send at least one more scouting trip, for just under $1,000 total. And even then, you're not guaranteed that your "scout" will provide you info on the categories you're interested in. Meanwhile, you could have simply scouted Texas and whichever surrounding state you're closest to, and had MUCH more accurate information on all 9 prospects, plus perhaps many that you overlook by focusing TOO much on starting values.

As I mentioned before, you're cutting off your nose to spite your face on this issue. You're gaining absolutely nothing by not using FSS, and you're losing a LOT. And I still can't figure out why.
Why do you care? And why should he listen to you? You've got as many championships as he does.

Obviously he doesn't think he's cutting off his nose to spite his face, and he seems to have some background from which to be able to make such a judgment. Just because you don't understand it doesn't mean it's wrong.

One thing you gain by not using FSS is obvious...money. So it's not accurate to say you gain nothing by not using it. 
You spend more money than you save. And I've never said I'm an expert at this game. I just know a helluva lot more about it than you do.
5/7/2014 8:48 PM
I'm tempted to try nick's method just to prove you wrong, but this might be the wrong year and place to do it if I do stay around. I can definitely see his way working in certain situations though. Since you're apparently not smart enough to figure out what those are, I'm not going to be the one to give you any ideas because after all why would I want to add to your knowledge when you already know SOOOOOO much more than me.

If I had almost 2500 games and no championships, I think I'd have admitted to myself by then that I'm just not very good, and gone on to do something else. 

I see the Villanova collapse is complete. IRL you'd be so fired right now.

Heck Northwood with its 4 scholarship players has won more games in the last half dozen than you have.

5/7/2014 8:55 PM
Posted by ettaexpress on 5/7/2014 8:56:00 PM (view original):
I'm tempted to try nick's method just to prove you wrong, but this might be the wrong year and place to do it if I do stay around. I can definitely see his way working in certain situations though. Since you're apparently not smart enough to figure out what those are, I'm not going to be the one to give you any ideas because after all why would I want to add to your knowledge when you already know SOOOOOO much more than me.

If I had almost 2500 games and no championships, I think I'd have admitted to myself by then that I'm just not very good, and gone on to do something else. 

I see the Villanova collapse is complete. IRL you'd be so fired right now.

Heck Northwood with its 4 scholarship players has won more games in the last half dozen than you have.

I am a better coach than you are, and it's not close. And with how unwilling to learn from people who try to help you, that state of affairs will never change. I'd bet good money that you never even SNIFF a high-major conference.

As for me, I play this game because I enjoy it. I come to these boards to learn from other coaches, and talk about HD. You apparently come here to act like an arrogant jagoff that already has all the answers. Have fun with that.
5/7/2014 9:00 PM
I don't spend as much as you think on those scouting trips. I couldn't imagine spending that much time on trips. It is my assumption that I probably start at a higher rating on a given trait that coaches often use. I haven't hit it with Hardin-Simmons, but of the two most important ratings to me, at least when I was at Nyack, overall were among the top in the D2 among ALL teams. Those were just really bad when I arrived at Hardin-Simmons. I suspect that is will be my last year there anyway. (My favorite level is D2)
5/7/2014 9:10 PM
How many scouting trips would you send on the scenario I proposed?
5/7/2014 9:14 PM
Also, being in a league with only 2 humans may be giving you a false sense of what can be accomplished with your plan to not take advantage of FSS. An average Ath of 35 is low, even for D3.
5/7/2014 9:19 PM
no offense to nickguy intended as he seems like a decent enough person, but I stopped trying to offer advice after he defended keeping the 15 ath 3 def PF for 4 seasons. He obviously has his own POV on the game and isn't interested in taking advice, so why keep offering it? 
5/7/2014 9:22 PM
Posted by dacj501 on 5/7/2014 9:22:00 PM (view original):
no offense to nickguy intended as he seems like a decent enough person, but I stopped trying to offer advice after he defended keeping the 15 ath 3 def PF for 4 seasons. He obviously has his own POV on the game and isn't interested in taking advice, so why keep offering it? 
I don't remember him doing that, so maybe I missed it. I guess I've just got so used to having advice ignored with insults, that when someone was clearly ignoring advice, but being polite while doing so, I failed to notice that the advice wasn't even really being considered.
5/7/2014 9:28 PM
Hard to say. I usually have a smaller list of players to approach because I look for certain things. I usually wait on scouting trips until I can get
an idea about player responses to contact. By then I am able to narrow my targets. I couldn't image more than two trips per player. My current ratings at my most important ratings give me the information I need. (You know if they are better than what I have)

Don't get me started on ATH. I know I won't have the popular opinion on that either. (it is very important, but I don't hold it in the highest regard.)
5/7/2014 9:45 PM
I've already admitted that Steve Long was a terrible move on my part. I 've been hoping he would transfer. Unless that has changed. Players used to leave all the time when they didn't get any playing time.
5/7/2014 9:48 PM
And it's not that I haven't hoped to get rid of him. I wasn't trying to defend keeping him. I have wanted to get rid of him, but trying to fill a scholarship in a weak conference with limited money made it difficult. I don't like carrying walk-on's because frankly they are bad too.
5/7/2014 9:56 PM
Oh, nickguy.  You're not going to win anything the way you're playing.  You'd really benefit from working with someone from the mentor thread.
5/7/2014 11:19 PM
Posted by wildcat98 on 5/7/2014 8:46:00 PM (view original):
Godwin's Law is now in effect: first person to mention Hitler in an argument loses.
Yeah, not really how it works there, chief. 
5/7/2014 11:34 PM
Posted by wildcat98 on 5/7/2014 9:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ettaexpress on 5/7/2014 8:56:00 PM (view original):
I'm tempted to try nick's method just to prove you wrong, but this might be the wrong year and place to do it if I do stay around. I can definitely see his way working in certain situations though. Since you're apparently not smart enough to figure out what those are, I'm not going to be the one to give you any ideas because after all why would I want to add to your knowledge when you already know SOOOOOO much more than me.

If I had almost 2500 games and no championships, I think I'd have admitted to myself by then that I'm just not very good, and gone on to do something else. 

I see the Villanova collapse is complete. IRL you'd be so fired right now.

Heck Northwood with its 4 scholarship players has won more games in the last half dozen than you have.

I am a better coach than you are, and it's not close. And with how unwilling to learn from people who try to help you, that state of affairs will never change. I'd bet good money that you never even SNIFF a high-major conference.

As for me, I play this game because I enjoy it. I come to these boards to learn from other coaches, and talk about HD. You apparently come here to act like an arrogant jagoff that already has all the answers. Have fun with that.

Jagoff? Are you from Pittsburgh, too?

Far as I can tell, your main activity on the board comes in responding with a snide remark to pretty much anything I say.

I probably won't ever *sniff* a high-major conference because I won't stay around long enough because of all the problems with this game. This is no longer an opinion which it can be said isn't shared. There's now very open conversation about issues with the game, but I'm sure I'll get no credit for that. That's cool, I'm used to it.

 

5/7/2014 11:38 PM
◂ Prev 1...13|14|15|16|17|18 Next ▸
long overdue...User Polls Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.