Posted by ahrens on 5/11/2013 10:46:00 AM (view original):
Posted by psap on 5/10/2013 7:07:00 PM (view original):
An easy argument? Great, make it then.
By you telling sjurat to go back into a his tent and vote, you can assume it will influence him to make a decision and lean one way or another. Also the safety in numbers circle jerk post could make people feel unsafe about their safety in numbers. Anything you say along the way of gameplay can influen e people choices, whether consciously or subconsciously
I was actually telling him to go back into his tent and wait for his voting orders from Pola...... but just because i say something does not mean it is in fact the truth. Lies are a part of many people's games including yourself. If i had done something even on the borderline of inappropriate influence I would suspect one of the game directors would have said something.
I hardly even expressed an opinion in my prior post, and even if you are of the belief that i had expressed an opinion it is not against the rules, nor in conflict with what happens in the actual game of Survivor. Just because the eliminated are not playing in the game any longer, they are still a part of the game -- and that does not stop them from communicating with each other and sharing their experiences and opinions of what happened during their time in the game, including their opinions of the players remaining -- they are not sequestered and sent off to solitary confinement. So just stop your whining and just play the game.
Oh - and here IS my opinion. None of you but Pola played this game worth a s*it. Compliment and a Curse.