SURVIVOR XII: Ahrens Crowned Champion Topic

Posted by psap on 5/22/2013 5:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by sjurat on 5/22/2013 9:56:00 AM (view original):
So I will declare my voting strategy public, with a suggestion to the game administrators:

My vote will be put on psap.

I also put forth that the rules be admended to address non-playing parties badgering current players via sitemail and forum boards.  If such activity is observed (and harkening back to Potter Stewart "you know when you see it") the offending party be BANNED from future Survivor tourneys. 

Keeping these type of players around would be akin to letting a guy who likes to go to the Philippines to cruise gilrs, babysit your kids.  Just not a good idea.
Its funny.... the only people who don't like what i am doing are the losers i am exposing for playing this game the sissy way you are doing it.
It is YOU 3 BLIND MICE who have left a sour taste in so many people's mouth.  I am getting so many UNSOLICITED emails from those vanquished who love what i am currently doing in a public manner.  Hell no this better not be banned - in Survivor you can say what you want, when you want, in any way you want.  What a horrible inconvenience that it doesn't mesh with your Boys Club strategy -- and more so actually exposes the joke this style of play makes of the game.

This is an effing INDIVIDUAL game and you guys are playing like a bunch of scared puss*ies -- and now comes SIR KISS AS* wanting the rules changed so i can't even expose you a-holes anymore.

I will be voted off tonite, and I will play again.  
And i will play under PSAP and i guarantee more people will want to play and partner with me than they EVER would want to play with you SJURAT.
I never lied.  I never broke a promise made.  In fact, people did that to me instead -- right MB?  And i was still cool with that.

Ahrens is also upset because i didn't divulge everything i knew to him?  I DON"T EFFING CARE!!!!  This is my game.  I told you before i want no part with your GDAM circle jerk you losers have going.  Passing Challenge Immunity to the Favorite?  THAT IS SO PATHETIC.  That now seals your ZERO VOTE fate Matt.

I'm gonna get voted off TWICE but i have probably had more fun than anyone in this game.  If you can't handle a little (or a lot) of CHAOS and don't want to make life uncomfortable for the popular kids, then don't play with me.  Winning by sacrificing your own competitive desires to protect someone else in an online game is sad.

I play hard and i have fun.  I attack the leaders and try to make them make moves.  I look for ways to exploit situations and do things anonymously, privately, or publically to manipulate people and situations.  There is no RIGHT WAY nor no WRONG WAY to play this game.  But for GOD'S SAKES -- play it on your own 2 feet.



You're right, you aren't angry about this game at all. Now I see it.

This message is polabonez approved. I checked before I sent it.

Now the clock has struck one and down I have to run. Hickory dickory dock.
5/22/2013 6:00 PM
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
5/22/2013 7:35 PM
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
5/22/2013 7:56 PM
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Prove that a Top-2 or 3 finish grooms one for the top spot in later games.
5/22/2013 8:09 PM
Posted by sjurat on 5/22/2013 8:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Prove that a Top-2 or 3 finish grooms one for the top spot in later games.
Actually, both Taft and Roosevelt had already been presidents......
5/22/2013 8:11 PM
I just deleted both of my posts trying to edit them.. But to summarize, it was me giving caesari the middle finger
5/22/2013 8:27 PM
Posted by polabonez on 5/22/2013 8:27:00 PM (view original):
I just deleted both of my posts trying to edit them.. But to summarize, it was me giving caesari the middle finger
I remember my first beer.
5/22/2013 9:39 PM
I dont
5/22/2013 10:12 PM
Posted by sjurat on 5/22/2013 8:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Prove that a Top-2 or 3 finish grooms one for the top spot in later games.
Is that what you think you are doing with Pola?  Getting "groomed"?  hahahahaha

Later games??   Hahahahaha

You are the biggest d-bag in here.  Everyone knows that.

5/22/2013 10:17 PM
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Taft was a Fat ***, Wilson a Racist and Teddy was a Warmonger...
5/22/2013 10:28 PM
Posted by shlog3131 on 5/22/2013 10:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Taft was a Fat ***, Wilson a Racist and Teddy was a Warmonger...
Hopefully the final 3 in this game are half as interesting.
5/22/2013 10:50 PM
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 10:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by shlog3131 on 5/22/2013 10:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Taft was a Fat ***, Wilson a Racist and Teddy was a Warmonger...
Hopefully the final 3 in this game are half as interesting.
Thats all Im hoping for.
5/22/2013 10:51 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by shlog3131 on 5/22/2013 10:51:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 10:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by shlog3131 on 5/22/2013 10:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by ahrens on 5/22/2013 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Posted by caesari on 5/22/2013 7:35:00 PM (view original):
No one cares who wins second. There is some food for thought.

WHo was the runner up in the 1914 election of Woodrow Wilson? See? That's my point. And don't tell me you know, cuz we all know you googled it.

Not sure what my point is here, but providing ammunition. Either side is welcome to it.
1914 didn't have an election.  1912 did, and Theodore Roosevelt was 2nd I believe.  Also Howard Taft was in the election (he got 3rd).  Or if you meant the election of 1916, no idea who was 2nd there.
Taft was a Fat ***, Wilson a Racist and Teddy was a Warmonger...
Hopefully the final 3 in this game are half as interesting.
Thats all Im hoping for.
I really hope the final 3 can compete with "The PSAP chronicles: survivor told through the eyes of a maniacal, paranoid & crazy islandmate" yeah, it's a long title, but the book is way longer.
5/22/2013 10:58 PM
VOTING RESULTS

2 votes for polabonez
4 votes for psap

Psap finishes in 6th place and joins the jury
5/22/2013 11:10 PM
◂ Prev 1...81|82|83|84|85...95 Next ▸
SURVIVOR XII: Ahrens Crowned Champion Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.