Posted by tsut30 on 10/27/2013 10:42:00 AM (view original):
Posted by csudak on 10/26/2013 10:38:00 PM (view original):Amen. It's their own fault for not using it when they had the chance.
Posted by psap on 10/26/2013 3:46:00 PM (view original):Not all rewards are created equal. Don't complain that one advantage was miniscule and this one is bigger if YOU DIDN"T EVEN BOTHER TO TRY AND USE THE FIRST ADVANTAGE.
Posted by csudak on 10/26/2013 2:52:00 PM (view original):So there you have it. The host biasing and influencing the game. Whatever.
Posted by da_goat on 10/26/2013 11:10:00 AM (view original):You guys didn't even try to take advantage of it last time
Pretty huge advantage for this challenge.....our advantage last time was so miniscule it was ridiculous!!
That logic is retarded. Look this is not a major issue, but it is an issue all the same.
Whether or not we decided to capitalize on an advantage given is not relevant, the issue is did the host INTENTIONALLY act biased and penal simply BECAUSE a challenge was dumped? Did he take the dump personally because of his time invested? Sure seems he was irritated.
Is the host attempting to influence behavior when there is no written rule about such behavior?
This act has been committed in every season while i have been playing and never has it seemed the other hosts have acted vindictively in response.
Is the host making judgements about how he FEELS the game should be played and has therefore decided that he will act as THE influencing force on the game if the tribes behavior conflicts with his beliefs how the game should or shouldn't be played?
When the advantages rewarded suddenly vary so substantially, it is more than logical for one to question whether or not this is intentionally transpiring.
When the host accidentally makes a material mistake at a critical juncture in the game , and then acts as if the outcome of the events are no big deal - as in "just shut up and make a f*ucking pick, any pick". It is more than fair to have your guard up and continue to look for suspicious behavior. When you have a contentious relationship with the host, and the host acts as follows, doesn't it seem a bit biased?
10/14/2013 10:16:00 PM
just pick a name
Sent: 10/14/2013 10:15:00 PM
Subject: RE: Demar
i'm just guessing here, but if the catagories are the 3 transformer movies -- revenge of the fallen, dark of the moon, and transformers -- you may have another mistake.
if it is some combo of the three or something else, then i am lose but just missing the connection. can you recheck the names please.
Sent: 10/14/2013 10:11:00 PM
Subject: RE: Demar
Remar, couldn't read my own writing
Sent: 10/14/2013 10:05:00 PM
Is Demar supposed to be DeMarco ?
10/27/2013 1:04 PM (edited)