Posted by chetty1963 on 7/3/2016 11:30:00 PM (view original):
Alex, I do admire your passion and competitiveness, but Wilkinson was really never about making it the best world at the expense of others. It grew because several coaches there banded together to create a media experience that makes the game more enjoyable for all.
Not to discourage you, but there have been numerous "fill the world" campaigns that were not sustainable because there was nothing to make them stand out. Writing a few blogs is great, but by themselves are not enough. You're asking for coaches to join, but haven't shared anything about how Leahy will be better than Wilkinson.
I do hope you succeed in your quest, because I'm in Leahy as well. I would encourage you to look at what Wilkinson is doing and be humble enough to learn from those that have helped lead the building of the media content (cjsweat, justaguy). You'll find that they will be more than willing to offer their advice. Again, this is not to slam what you're doing. I'd like nothing better than for you to succeed and create an even better coaching experience than Wilkinson.
Very well put. I just recently added another team and chose Warner. My reasoning was because of the activity at d2 in that world. I am however at d1aa and will move up to d1 at some point. Even though I'm not getting the benefit of the extra content that's being done at d2 I saw it as the most likely world to evolve into what wilkinson has turned into.
Now if if some other world, be it Hayes yost etc, had a group of coaches start doing what wilkinson has done then I would likely join that world. I guess my point is that at the current I would put wilkinson #1 and Warner #2 in regards to extra content provided by users. Until a group of coaches decides to push for another world to "fill up", or wis makes some changes, then I don't see any big changes in the population of worlds.