I didn't respond because it's not a good comparison to homosexuals. The person who is a detriment to society because he's wasting the government's money is not the same as being a homosexual. That person is judged for that reason.
No one is saying they are the same in every way. However, they are both judged by society for their personal choices, so in that sense it is an incredibly accurate comparison.
If homosexuals are judged for having gay sex, they'd also be judged for having an innate attraction to the same sex.
No, they wouldn't, and they aren't, because people do not judge biological diversity the same way they do diversity of choice.
People are far more accepting and less judgmental when it comes to biological differences. Because of that, the agenda is to get people to think of sexuality on the same level as race or gender (being attributed to biology rather than choices).
The fact is that sexuality is a matter of choice and the campaign to convince people otherwise is based upon a lie.