Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:03:00 PM (view original):
So you're resorting to repeating your failed point. Good job, bis lite.

SS couples can apply for a marriage license.    Equal rights right there.

Anything else?

But they can't get one. What purpose does the restriction serve?

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by AlCheez on 5/3/2013 2:07:00 PM (view original):
What kind of weird fishing license test do they have in Idaho?  Any state I've ever bought a fishing license in, the test was "Do you have X dollars to give me right now?"

I don't fish.  Beats me.  But I know you need a license. 

Posted by AlCheez on 5/3/2013 2:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by AlCheez on 5/3/2013 2:07:00 PM (view original):
What kind of weird fishing license test do they have in Idaho?  Any state I've ever bought a fishing license in, the test was "Do you have X dollars to give me right now?"

I don't fish.  Beats me.  But I know you need a license. 

But there's no test involved in acquiring one, unless you consider handing your credit card to the clerk in the sporting goods section of your local Wal-Mart a test.

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:12:00 PM (view original):
Oh, I get it now.   If you can't pass the test, make the test easier.    Yeah, that's why we're the worldwide leader in education!!!!!

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:16:00 PM (view original):
IIRC, there was no test for a marriage license.   I just had to meet the requirement.

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:16:00 PM (view original):
IIRC, there was no test for a marriage license.   I just had to meet the requirement.

Fine, what purpose does the requirement serve?

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:16:00 PM (view original):
IIRC, there was no test for a marriage license.   I just had to meet the requirement.

Fine, what purpose does the requirement serve?

To restrict people who fail to meet the requirements from getting a license.    Duh.

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:16:00 PM (view original):
IIRC, there was no test for a marriage license.   I just had to meet the requirement.

Fine, what purpose does the requirement serve?

To restrict people who fail to meet the requirements from getting a license.    Duh.

This is going nowhere, bis lite, because there is no reason to prevent gay people from marrying.

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/3/2013 2:18:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:16:00 PM (view original):
IIRC, there was no test for a marriage license.   I just had to meet the requirement.

Fine, what purpose does the requirement serve?

To restrict people who fail to meet the requirements from getting a license.    Duh.

This is going nowhere, bis lite, because there is no reason to prevent gay people from marrying.

Well, if you throw out the fact that they fail to meet the requirements to get a marriage license then you're right.

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/3/2013 2:23:00 PM (view original):
But, out of curiousity, did you suddenly discover this was going nowhere on page 132?

That seems to make you a bit slow.