Posted by tecwrg on 6/10/2013 5:37:00 PM (view original):
You've taken a hard left turn into Bistizaville. Now, population: 2.
Are you implying that people waiting until their 30's to have children is somehow going to doom the human race? That it would somehow be more harmful than the entire human race becoming exclusively homosexual, not procreating, and becoming extinct within the next 75-100 years?
Please explain this fascinating new theory to us.
My point is that, with respect to evolution and progression of the human race, homosexuality is not a desirable trait because it negatively impacts procreation. Procreating being a vital component of evolution.
Of course it wouldn't be as bad, but it would be bad. And, according to you that's the criteria for...well I'm not sure exactly. I asked bis if he thought homosexuality was ok and you brought up the evolutionary point. I can assume you're arguing that hosexuality isn't ok because if everyone did it, it would negatively impact evolution.
If everyone waited until their thirties to have kids, it would also negatively impact evolution
But who cares? Everyone isn't gay and everyone isn't waiting until their thirties to have kids.
So what's your point?