Posted by dahsdebater on 6/15/2013 6:01:00 PM (view original):
And that's your justification for continuing to promote disciminatory laws?
My "justification" has been that the definition of "marriage" has never been altered from it's original, accepted meaning in the history of the United States of America.
I'm fine with "civil union" having the same benefits/pitfalls of "marriage".
IMO, that resolves the entire issue. Traditionalists/religious folk keep their "sanctity of marriage" and the homosexuals get equal billing, so to speak.