Posted by tecwrg on 6/26/2013 6:12:00 PM (view original):
Anything Walker may have said or done is certainly tainted by his appearance of a conflict of interest. We already had this discussion.
Are you now asserting that it's appropriate for a lower court to overrule SCOTUS?
Nope, I'm saying that neither of us is qualified to determine whether or not Baker was binding over Perry. Walker addressed the argument and ruled that it wasn't.
Also, neither one of us can say with any confidence that Walker was biased and unable to put aside his personal feelings.
But we do know that a federal appellate court reviewed his decision and didnt overturn it, based on Baker or anything else.
Apparently you know more about Constitutional law than both a District Court judge and a panel of Federal Judges. Yet you still don't consider yourself qualified to give an opinion on the constitutionality of DOMA.