TEXAS REPS. HAVE NO SHAME Topic

This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
Posted by antoncresten on 4/19/2013 4:59:00 AM (view original):
VOTED AGAINST HURRICANE SANDY FEMA RELIEF FOR MILLIONS OF VICTIMS.

NOW SEEKING FEMA AID FOR FERT. PLANT EXLOSION
So votong against a huge cost isnt different than voting against a small cost?
4/20/2013 12:46 PM
antoncresten
Posts: 9094 (0)
Hall of Famer
296 3
Hall of Famer
4/20/2013 6:23 PM
seamar_116
Posts: 3653 (0)
Hall of Famer
304
Hall of Famer
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/20/2013 12:46:00 PM (view original):
Posted by antoncresten on 4/19/2013 4:59:00 AM (view original):
VOTED AGAINST HURRICANE SANDY FEMA RELIEF FOR MILLIONS OF VICTIMS.

NOW SEEKING FEMA AID FOR FERT. PLANT EXLOSION
So votong against a huge cost isnt different than voting against a small cost?
Swamp's house burns down = help me.

The entire block next to me burns down = screw 'em.

Glad you clarified that for us Swamp, thanks. You are a true humanitarian.

4/21/2013 1:51 AM
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
There are some people that are being radical about spending.

They want every dolar accounted for.

This may or may not be right, but it is a position.

If the relief money was met with cuts there would have been no delays or votes against it.

4/21/2013 1:11 PM
seamar_116
Posts: 3653 (0)
Hall of Famer
304
Hall of Famer
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/21/2013 1:11:00 PM (view original):
There are some people that are being radical about spending.

They want every dolar accounted for.

This may or may not be right, but it is a position.

If the relief money was met with cuts there would have been no delays or votes against it.

BS---if they tried to cut anything from the Defense budget the Republicans would go nuts.
4/22/2013 4:35 AM
burnsy483
Posts: 6848 (0)
Veteran
1 1 26
Prospect
Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/21/2013 1:11:00 PM (view original):
There are some people that are being radical about spending.

They want every dolar accounted for.

This may or may not be right, but it is a position.

If the relief money was met with cuts there would have been no delays or votes against it.

By the same logic, wouldn't this same person not want money from the government until cuts were made?
4/22/2013 2:04 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
I don't think you understand our "FAIR SHARE" government.

It's not about what you can give, it's about what you can get from those who are giving.
4/22/2013 2:28 PM
TEXAS REPS. HAVE NO SHAME Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.