Posted by rangerup on 6/21/2013 5:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 6/19/2013 1:54:00 PM (view original):I have taken two dreadful teams and spent multiple seasons with them, and built them both into division winners for the next decade with WS appearances. I just find it awfully tedious and boring. You would figure with so many seasons invested in some of your worlds teccywrgger you would have at last figured out how to plan for a good team, but looking at your card that has not happened. Never fear, one of these days you are bound to squeak in as a wild card and with any luck, win a ring. But judging from your record I highly doubt you will ever run a world dominant team. Not that that is anything wrong with that.
I suppose if I hopped from world to world, looking for the low hanging fruit that would give me a handful of cheap trophies, I'd have a resume similar to rangers, and I would come here and give bad advice to others who are trying to figure out how the ratings work.
Unfortunately for me, I do neither.
Let's review your four trophies.
1) Glavine300 - you took over a team that won the WS the season before you joined, and won a WS in your second season there.
2) Let's Play Two - you took over a team that won 99 games the season before, and won a WS in your only season there.
3) No Trade Clause - you took over a team that won 80 games the season before and won a WS in your second season there
4) Parks - you took over a team that won 94 games the season before and won a WS in your first season there
Yep, that sure seems like you put in a lot of hard work to build winners.