No, my point is you ignore the question and go after a correct answer 80 days after the fact. You're creating an argument when none is necessary. You can't trade a player after the deadline if he hasn't cleared waivers. He qualified his question with "can it be done like a normal trade". Which, for a "normal trade", players would have to clear waivers after the deadline. Then, in your rush to post an unnecessary disagreement, you ignore the new question. In other words, you took the jerk road. Congrats, happy traveling.