Which of these two players would you sign for a PF/C slot?

Name	Pos.	GPA	FG%	FT%	A	SPD	REB	DE	BLK	LP	PE	BH	P	WE	ST	DU	TOT
Stanley Jackson	SF	2.86	70.0	69.0	74	16	49	49	23	69	3	16	14	47	77	39	476
Thomas Wilborn	C	2.87	68.8	65.4	58	18	54	48	46	69	23	15	19	36	64	45	495

I'd need to know where the regular high/low potentials are, plus you probably want to read the last two lines back to yourself.

I prefer Jackson, if all of the potentials are even - you're giving up the ability to shoot from distance and twenty-something points of BLK for 15ish of ATH and ST, and for me, that's an acceptable trade. Really depends on the potentials, though.

EDIT: now the potential colors are showing. hold a sec.

OK, with those potentials, I'd say that Jackson's the better player, but you want Wilborn if the guy's going to have to play at the 4 or the 5.  Jackson just isn't a post player.

#2 is the better big with the rebounding hitting at least high 70s. Jackson is a longer term project that could end up as a pretty good sf. 

even with the REB advantage for Wilborn, i think Jackson is by far the better PF and I really don't think its that close

EDIT: I missed the LP, with this Wilborn is the better C but I take Jackson at the 3/4

It depends on the Division, D2 or D3? Offense, defense? Returning SF's & Big's?

at D2 or above I wouldn't want either. Jackson's bh and pas limit his usefulness at the 3 and his rebounding is too low for the frontcourt. Wilborn is limited by weak ath and def. Both would be ok role players at D2 I guess. I'd hate to rely on either. If its D3, take Jackson. His eventual 80 ath will help compensate for some of the lack of reb if he plays the 4.