10/24/2012 11:32 AM (edited)
LEAGUE#: 28676

You have 200M to spend, pal! That's right, eff Bettman and his pack of money laundering swindlers. You got it; you spend it!

Choose a franchise (Phoenix, Winnipeg; New Jersey, Kansas City, Colorado; etc.). All franchises are exclusive! No repeats.

This is the 70s and 80s versus the 90s and 00s! Which era is better? Defense or total offense? Let's find out.

Clarence Campbell Conference will be the old 70s and 80s. Prince of Wales Conference will be Bettman's goons of the 90s and 00s.

Here's the rules:

1. 200m Cap
2. No WW
3. Trades On (within Conference only)
4. No PI
5. No ML
6. No Clones
7. ALL GOALIE SA% BELOW 90!! (both conferences)
8. YES to Twisting (by the pool)

Additional Rules for CCC (1970/71 to 1989/90)

1. All player D Rating BELOW 80
2. At least ONE Goon with a PIM ABOVE 200 (must play all games)
3. Only twisting within the above years

Additional Rules for POW (1990/91 - 2011/12)

1. All player D Rating BELOW 90
2. At least ONE Goon with a PIM above 250 (must play all games)
3. Only twisting within the above years

Drop the puck!

10/29/2012 3:10 PM (edited)

Clarence Campbell Conference
1970-1971 to 1989-1990
Max D Rating: 79
Max SA%: 89.99

1. the_jsa - EDMONTON OILERS
2. kiteport - BUFFALO SABRES
3. halen66 - DETROIT RED WINGS
4. crackatoeha - BOSTON BRUINS

Prince of Wales Conference
1990-1991 to 2011-2012
Max D Rating: 89
Max SA%: 89.99

2. taybaijor - NEW YORK RANGERS
3. richie71 - NEW JERSEY DEVILS
5. oc3lus - ST. LOUIS BLUES

10/20/2012 10:50 AM (edited)
If this flies I'll take a team in the CCC .............Detroit
10/20/2012 9:36 AM
I'll take the 70's-80's Oilers
10/20/2012 1:01 PM
10/20/2012 3:38 PM
did the requirements change from all Defencemen under 80D to all Players under 80D?
10/21/2012 2:42 AM
I' take the Devils 90-2012
10/21/2012 10:45 AM (edited)
POW  New York Rangers
10/21/2012 7:16 PM
Posted by the_jsa on 10/20/2012 3:38:00 PM (view original):
did the requirements change from all Defencemen under 80D to all Players under 80D?
It's always been ALL PLAYERS.
10/21/2012 8:43 PM
POW Los Angeles Kings.
10/22/2012 3:17 PM
10/27/2012 8:11 AM
OKay, kiteport,  here's another opportunity 2 re-correct me here...
Am confused about the exclusivity (franchise-wise), as it seems
U have already sub-divided each franchise, by era, the decades,
& even by offensive & defensive game styles...

Am liking the ideas U founded here, draftwise... But, it appears
as though 1 owner has taken the early Oilers, in his post here...
&, it don't seem like he's also ask'n 4 the recent Oilers...

Point is that which LA Kings did mlsb88 snag 4 himself, is also
a legitimate question here... So's mine... Can eye sign-up 4 the
recent Kings from 1 Conference, ---OR--- can eye have the early
Kings dating back 2 the 70's, ---whichever ever 1 is in the other
conference ???

Fair, --- or how ??? --->>> Sub-divided, or knot ???--->>> Kewl ?

10/27/2012 11:08 AM
You can have two teams in either conference that are the same.
10/27/2012 1:28 PM
OKay & kewl, kiteport  --->>>

From the menu, "KiNG" me then,
& put 'em in a bowl of Campbell's
soup... That'll work...

Will call 'em "h0LLyWooD-KiNgS"
so mlsb88 can use Los Angeles...
10/28/2012 6:12 PM (edited)
C.C.C. Boston for me please......
of 2

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999- WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.