14 identical lineups -- best and worse Topic

From a league I ran using 14 teams with the same players/lineups.  The 14 teams had a 70M salary (there were 2 more teams in the league, with a 90M salary).  Every team in the league used the neutral WhatIfSports Park.  I drafted plenty of PA/IP so no player ever appeared in a game below 100%, and every position player started every game of the season.

For batters I'll use OPS to determine best and worse seasons (numbers in brackets after the name are the normalized real life stats):

1888 Hugh Nicol (.251/.346/.300/.646)
.302     .393     .349     .742
.216     .293     .250     .543

1887 Blondie Purcell (.246/.314/.351/.665)

.288     .333     .395     .728
.218     .278     .260     .538

1892 Arlie Latham (.246/.316/.308/.624)
.266     .336     .328     .664
.219     .275     .266     .541

1892 Doggie Miller (.263/.341/.352/.693)
.298     .364     .387     .751
.242     .327     .276     .603

1887 Cub Stricker (.259/.330/.333/.663)
.265     .341     .333     .674
.239     .297     .284     .581

2007 Dan Uggla (.244/.323/.458/.782)
.284     .342     .471     .813
.206     .271     .334     .605

1991 Cecil Fielder (.262/.347/.506/.853)
.303     .375     .523     .898
.233     .329     .343     .672

1995 Sammy Sosa (.267/.339/.487/.826)
.298     .393     .460     .853
.225     .333     .338     .671

Here are the best and worst seasons of the 5 starting pitchers (who averaged about 210 or so innings apiece).  I'll use ERA to determine best and worst seasons -- the additional two stats are OAV and WHIP.  (Numbers in brackets after name are ERC#, OAV# and WHIP#.)

1941 Hal Schumacher (3.41/.245/1.29)
2.69     .217     1.18
5.47     .284     1.64

1988 Dave LaPoint (3.39/.258/1.28)
2.90     .266     1.25
5.28     .300     1.62

1976 John Denny (3.49/.250/1.29)

2.88     .254     1.39
4.71     .258     1.47

2002 Vicente Padilla (3.32/.255/1.22)
2.77     .239     1.15
4.80     .273     1.39

1989 John Farrell (3.35/.245/1.29)
2.98     .226     1.24
4.84     .265     1.54

In real life the 5 pitchers had similar normalized stats, so it's interesting to see that their personal bests and worsts matched up so closely to one another.
11/22/2012 8:01 PM (edited)
My rough statistical model predicts that for most of these player, there should be a range of about 0.06 to 0.07 in their batting averages or obp.  Looking at the results, my model isn't too bad.
11/21/2012 10:52 PM
Used to do this (alot) w/ the free exhibiton leagues, -&
there upon came the notion that my random selection
of salary caps for each full league, was skewing those
results that were emerging...

Obviously, the chasm between best-&-worst is a good
study here, however --->>> let me explain...

The redundant capping in brain-washed increments of
5's, & 10's, is instead an unfruitful fork-in-the-road, as
we all seek to discover those in the database who've
MOST consistently & reliably performed... Arbitrarily,
the tendency to stop a cap at $40 mil, or $115 mil, -is
is (at best) just another stage, -or rung-on-the-ladder,
wherein a fine tuning adjustment needs to be tested...

An example would be to tweak any given cap, & run
a series of test leagues at a cap of $77 mil, $73 mil,
or even dance around that $70 mil cap above, with a
good dozen leagues at $68 mil, or $71.5 mil... Those
studies narrow the normalizations for standard caps
which grace the classifieds...

Thanks for sharing your numbers at $70 mil... -&, can
truly appreciate the approach that produced the above
roster... Differences are staunch & stout comparing all
of the 'PFielder/DUggla' (presumed) middle of the line-
up 'numbers'... 

This isn't really a 50/50 coin flip here... Pitching doesn't
show above as a strength concern, rather, it seems like
the 100% fatigue goal was the accomplishment ... Just
because you make fatigue a non-concern by managing
pitchers well, it may hamper the search for hitting, which
can offset lower cap leagues, when everyone else must
often start a pitcher at less than 100%...

Most certainly in my opinion, there should have been a
slightly modified option, to compare the gap between a
best & a worst... This would be a more proficient study
(at this point), to partner PFielder w/ someone else at a
slightly lower/higher cap (either way), --& try partnering
DUggla with another in the 3rd-4th-5th-&-6th slots...

To me, once you escalate 'OFF' of that standard cap in
the free leagues, the hitting starts to have an edge here.

11/22/2012 8:34 PM (edited)
"And now, filling in for the absent italyprof, jsakicno19 ..."
11/22/2012 3:44 PM
It looks like the WORST for pitchers isn't as bad as the WORST for hitters - but only because I don't really look at ERA when I see pitchers stats.  It's definitely interesting though - I know I would hate to get those "worst" versions of a player on my teams
11/22/2012 6:06 PM
I edited the first post, adding in the players' real life normalized numbers, to give the best/worst lines more context.  

I wouldn't necessarily say the batters' worsts are worse than the pitchers' worsts relative to their normalized numbers -- most of the batters just stunk in real life.
11/22/2012 8:02 PM
With their actual stats there it's not so apparent.  What I saw was more the difference between BEST and WORSE.  Offensive bests seemed to be far superior than offensive worsts - while pitching bests, while still significantly better, don't seem as far from the worsts.  
11/22/2012 8:42 PM
pinotfan, that was gratuitous. I was just getting my AVERAGE word count per month down. I figured since I couldn't ever win boogerlip's award for comments I might as well be average. 

But thanks for noticing I was missing ! 
12/2/2012 7:36 PM
Now, as to these stats, they seem pretty wide variations to me. They might be within a certain margin, but if you can't tell if a batter will hit .230 or .300, you have a problem. 

Thanks for posting these crazystengel. They have confirmed my methodology of using the I-ching and flipping coins to set me line-up !
12/2/2012 7:38 PM
Posted by chargingryno on 11/22/2012 8:42:00 PM (view original):
With their actual stats there it's not so apparent.  What I saw was more the difference between BEST and WORSE.  Offensive bests seemed to be far superior than offensive worsts - while pitching bests, while still significantly better, don't seem as far from the worsts.  
Starting pitchers most always will have more PA against than any hitter has PA, they therefore are far more likely to regress to the mean.
12/2/2012 11:43 PM
14 identical lineups -- best and worse Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2016 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.