http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_Doctrine
And I know someone is going to laugh at using Wikipedia.
It is just a good collection of data and information.
The idea that with so many people using Bush Doctrine to mean so many things, but almost no one in the Administration labeling it as anything specific, it couldnt have a real meaning.
Palin wasnt some Washington insider that goes to Cocktail parties at the trendy Jonx. She doesnt hear casual insider chat. Given that her asking for a refocus of the question was totally resonable. Andif ANYONE else had asked he would have said "Premptive strikes" or whatever.
He smelled the gotcha and went for it!
Is it so hard for the left to give up on something so obvious? Cant you just admit this one?