Posted by killbatman on 4/18/2013 10:39:00 AM (view original):
"wiping those veteran teams out might sound good for a minute, it would at least get easier to win championships! and im sure a few of the multiple team guys are cheating and so youd catch a few cheaters, too - just like you would wiping out ANY segment of this game's population."
I feel like people are REALLY misreading this part. He's not saying he knows people on that list are cheating. He's saying that if you took ANY random segment of the HD population, you'd likely find a few cheaters.
What difference does it make? I don't care what segment of HD we look at. Any user coaching multiple teams in the same world should have one of those teams taken away. It doesn't matter if they are the winningest or losingest coach in that world.
And yes, it is significant to admit that among the "most elite" coaches in HD there are as many cheaters as any other segment. YES. That is a significant statement. An NCAA sanction against Ohio State is a lot more significant to college football than a sanction against Miami. Why? Ohio State is actually winning championships.
Maybe aejones and billyg should amend their wordy advice posts to new users. How to win in D2 and D3: Recruiting: "Get a second username so you can coach another team in the same world. Now running out of budget money won't be a problem for you. You can save all the money on FSS by scouting states with your other username. This is crucial to winning in HD."
Give me a break.