I love this contradictory statement from Farrell:
""I will say this, the 2003 test I think that's being referred to ... I don't know how many times David has been tested since then. Whatever that number is, I'm sure it's a very high one," Farrel said. "He's tested clean every single time. It's unfortunate that the innuendo continues to follow him. He's a heckuva player, one hell of a hitter. There's no reason other than hard work and talent that's produced that."
So despite referring to the failed test, it's all "innuendo"? And since he's been tested a lot since then, it's all talent and hard work now?
7/8/2014 9:23 PM (edited)