7/12/2013 9:28 PM
I am doing some test games against a 24 game instinct, 24 technique quarterback.  Here are his completion percentages for 10 games-74,73,53,59,64,56,61,68,76,64. 
This is d2, which makes it even more sad.  He is averaging about 350 yards passing.  If anyone is even trying, how can we even expect any serious improvement in this version, when ratings are irrelevant?  A 24,24 quarterback should be a Pop Warner quarterback.  Let's just cut our losses and stick with 2.0.

7/12/2013 9:33 PM
Would prefer they make adjustments to version 3 or start over with it.  Version 2 is not very good.  I know there are a few coaches who are more than happy version 3 failed because they like 2, but there are also many who will quit altogether if version 2 is the only option for the long haul. 
7/12/2013 10:49 PM
As a proponent of V2, I am not thrilled that this version has failed, or is on its way. While I don't care for the advanced version, the basic has merit, but needs to be improved on if it is going to take over as the staple for GD. I gave up on testing with most of these teams because I feel to really test, you have to have the horses and with sim recruits that's not possible, or very unlikely. I would dare to say that whatever testing any of us do, it is not us that has failed but more like the programmers have failed us.

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

Popular on WhatIfSports site: Baseball Simulation | College Basketball Game | College Football Game | Online Baseball Game | Hockey Simulation | NFL Picks | College Football Picks | Sports Games

© 1999- WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.