LOL. I'm bored. Seems USFB called a FL owner a tanker. No idea if it's true but here's his record:
1
|
88-74
|
0.543
|
2nd
|
Yes
|
No
|
no
|
no
|
no
|
2
|
93-69
|
0.574
|
1st
|
No
|
Yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
yes
|
3
|
80-82
|
0.494
|
1st
|
No
|
Yes
|
yes
|
no
|
no
|
4
|
63-99
|
0.389
|
3rd
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
5
|
50-112
|
0.309
|
4th
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
6
|
59-103
|
0.364
|
4th
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
7
|
62-100
|
0.383
|
4th
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
8
|
59-103
|
0.364
|
4th
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
9
|
58-104
|
0.358
|
4th
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
10
|
0-0
|
---
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
He's booted from Coop after S5. There's your "competitiveness" proof, dummy. I'll not deny that an owner or two has a bad season, or run, from time to time in Coop. However, if they put together something like this, they're not in Coop. Well, no one puts together a string like this because they're booted after S5 for being unable to win 195 games over a three season span.