Posted by MikeT23 on 10/24/2013 11:01:00 AM (view original):
Why are YOU arguing this?
You're obviously entitled to have your own definition of "young". As a 50 y/o man, I think you applied it incorrectly but you can still define it as you see fit. You'd be wrong and I know you aren't changing your mind but it's your opinion.
Do you think I'm going to suddenly say "Yeah, on second thought, 48 is young"?
If a 55 year old played in the NFL, he'd be considered old for an NFL player, agree? That same 55 year old in congress would not be considered old for a congressman, agree?
Old/young are relative. Relative the entire population, 48 is not young. Relative congress, 48 is young.