he definitely looks good to me, but not best ever material, i doubt hes best of the new engine era, either. naming a player best ever is fairly pointless and meaningless anyway, as there are about as many "best players" as there are different situations - which is to say, a lot. plus, cross era, you cant compare ratings, you'd have to compare value to the team to make it meaningful, and its incredibly difficult for coaches to accurately make that assessment. i had a bunch of guys in the old d2 days who, for the time, were a lot better than that. but with the ratings of today, you would take that guy. in the old days, i wouldnt even sign this dude. so how do you compare?
theres a bunch of players who have lead their team to multiple championships, i feel like when a guy does that, then hes in the conversation :) until then hes just a pretty picture!