Posted by morganballer on 10/20/2013 2:51:00 AM (view original):
i should have been more clear:
he is low in only rebounding and sb (both of which he is 0 in)
he is high in speed, perimeter, and bh. judging by his growth in per vs bh, i'd say he's basically still high/high in perimeter.
average in the rest.
i'd project him at:
athleticism: 98 (..100 maybe?)
speed: 66 (conservative)
defense: 100 (he was 77 and high coming in)
perimeter: 70 (also pretty conservative)
all you guys atlking about overall ratings and how he's not even close need to have your heads examined
im assuming here you are considering this guy to be a sg? hes a great sg, that can't be denied - but there have been great sgs in this era with 90+ spd/per who still had strong ath/def. not that good, but the overall package was more appealing IMO. this guy is great though. i take back what i said about not even being willing to sign him in the olden days, i considered him as a 3, and also, not with the same lofty projections (guess i could have assumed it was like, all high high, but without that being listed, i didnt). nice signing for sure