2016 Presidential Race Topic

This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Trump is obviously a RACIST!!!!! as here's Palin's daughter.

7/29/2015 10:46 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by moy23 on 7/29/2015 8:42:00 AM (view original):
It's hard for me to take a democrat serious when they critique a candidates track record... After all they recently voted for a guy with no to very little experience, the same guy who voted 'present' the majority of time he was in office.... But hey, he looked good giving a speech.
Who is "the guy" they voted for?
7/29/2015 12:49 PM
Sounds like he's referring to Barry Obama.
7/29/2015 12:50 PM
That wouldn't make sense. Obama was a U.S. Senator. That's, like, the opposite of "no to very little experience."
7/29/2015 12:57 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/29/2015 12:57:00 PM (view original):
That wouldn't make sense. Obama was a U.S. Senator. That's, like, the opposite of "no to very little experience."
BL - dont be stupid. He wasn't a governor. He never governed anything. He held no jobs in the private sector that I know of. He had maybe 3 years as a US Senator of which 2+ was spent campaigning for president. Compared to Senators like John Kerry and John McCain that have over 25 years of US Senate experience Obama is a novice (at best). It's not like Obama passed any major legislation or bills while he was a US Senator either.... He has little if any track record as a US Senator. It's no wonder he has no clue how to reach across the aisle - its because he barely has 'experience' doing so in his brief and unproductive stint as a US Senator.
7/29/2015 1:26 PM
If you had said, "they voted for a guy who was never a governor," you would have been correct. But a US Senator is the opposite of "no experience."
7/29/2015 1:35 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/29/2015 1:35:00 PM (view original):
If you had said, "they voted for a guy who was never a governor," you would have been correct. But a US Senator is the opposite of "no experience."
Do me a favor....

Write out Hillary's experience (resume)... Now write out Obama's.

Now put them side by side.

7/29/2015 1:37 PM
Wait, do you think Clinton is unqualified for election?

If her experience is similar to Obama's, that's a pretty strong argument for her election, since Obama has done a good job.
7/29/2015 1:46 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/29/2015 1:46:00 PM (view original):
Wait, do you think Clinton is unqualified for election?

If her experience is similar to Obama's, that's a pretty strong argument for her election, since Obama has done a good job.
JFC!

Hillary is DEFINITELY qualified....

4 years as Sec of State
8 years as a US Senator
8 years as 1st Lady
A decade or so of 1st Lady in Arkansas

Could list plenty of accomplishments.



Obama:

3 years as a US Senator (most of the time spent here was campaigning)
7 years as the District 13 Illinois Senator

Accomplishments:
Made a good speech
Voted 'present' 129 times as a state senator
7/29/2015 1:57 PM
Accomplishments:

Did a good job as President.
7/29/2015 2:05 PM
◂ Prev 1...43|44|45|46|47...575 Next ▸
2016 Presidential Race Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.