2016 Presidential Race Topic

2/11/2016 5:06 AM
2/11/2016 5:07 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by The Taint on 2/10/2016 10:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 2/10/2016 8:50:00 PM (view original):
Here's the thing that amazes me:

The Dems have convinced the poor blacks that they're looking out for them.
The Repubs have convinced the poor whites that they're looking out for them. 
Money is green and doesn't give a **** what color hand holds it. 

The only logic that makes sense is poor people, of any color, are not smart enough to realize nobody gives a **** about them.  

Have the Dems convinced the poor blacks that they're looking out for them....or have the Repugs convinced them that they aren't.
Perhaps the Dems have convinced them that the Repubs aren't.   Either way, the poor black vote believes the Dems are more on their side.   And they are not.   No one is.
2/11/2016 6:59 AM
Posted by The Taint on 2/10/2016 11:16:00 PM (view original):
OH!!!  The ol' pull out the crazy and present them as examples of the evil other party trick.

Good one.


Dumbass.

2/11/2016 7:02 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by The Taint on 2/11/2016 9:33:00 AM (view original):
Posted by edsortails on 2/11/2016 12:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 2/10/2016 10:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 2/10/2016 8:50:00 PM (view original):
Here's the thing that amazes me:

The Dems have convinced the poor blacks that they're looking out for them.
The Repubs have convinced the poor whites that they're looking out for them. 
Money is green and doesn't give a **** what color hand holds it. 

The only logic that makes sense is poor people, of any color, are not smart enough to realize nobody gives a **** about them.  

Have the Dems convinced the poor blacks that they're looking out for them....or have the Repugs convinced them that they aren't.
It amazes me more that people on either side seem to believe that all the good guys are in their party and all the bad guys are in the other



and short of believing that fully, they will still try to present a case that represents it as truth
I don't think anyone believes that.
Really?
2/11/2016 9:43 AM
Posted by The Taint on 2/11/2016 9:35:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 2/11/2016 7:02:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 2/10/2016 11:16:00 PM (view original):
OH!!!  The ol' pull out the crazy and present them as examples of the evil other party trick.

Good one.


Dumbass.

Would you like a list of the non crazies who believe that a woman should get stuck with a baby when conception was caused by rape?



How many pregnancies, percentage-wise, are the product of rape?
2/11/2016 9:45 AM
Posted by The Taint on 2/11/2016 9:35:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 2/11/2016 7:02:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 2/10/2016 11:16:00 PM (view original):
OH!!!  The ol' pull out the crazy and present them as examples of the evil other party trick.

Good one.


Dumbass.

Would you like a list of the non crazies who believe that a woman should get stuck with a baby when conception was caused by rape?



Who cares. It's OK for people to have dissenting opinions.

Have any of those guys reversed Roe v Wade?
2/11/2016 9:52 AM
Posted by The Taint on 2/11/2016 9:35:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 2/11/2016 7:02:00 AM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 2/10/2016 11:16:00 PM (view original):
OH!!!  The ol' pull out the crazy and present them as examples of the evil other party trick.

Good one.


Dumbass.

Would you like a list of the non crazies who believe that a woman should get stuck with a baby when conception was caused by rape?



Sure.   I'm positive you have it bookmarked somewhere so no research will be required on your end.
2/11/2016 9:55 AM
Gary! Gary! Gary! Gary! Gary!

#FeelMyJohnson
2/11/2016 10:33 AM
2/11/2016 1:48 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by bad_luck on 2/8/2016 2:16:00 PM (view original):
Trump's going to win NH. That's almost certain. Does it mean anything going forward? Probably not.
You'll be saying this a lot.... Just replacing the state each time. South Carolina loves Trump and Trump Ioves South Carolina.
2/11/2016 6:52 PM
◂ Prev 1...148|149|150|151|152...575 Next ▸
2016 Presidential Race Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.