I meant specifically what number are they ranked in the PR. My theory is they should be ranked lower because their RPI is sort of artificially inflated by how they scheduled (not that I'm saying that's an evil thing or anything). I just wanted to test that theory is all. And actually they only have ONE top-100 win, not two like I misstated.
As far as your question about NT vs PI..I believe it is used for both. At least that's the way I think of it. Not the "lock/bubble/out" part of the report, but the rankings. What I mean is, after they've filled the NT, all the teams left over are probably ranked exactly the same way as the NT teams were. So you would just start at say #65--for simplicity's sake--and that's where your rankings for the PI start.