Random 5 (47 mil.) - (14 in) Revised Topic

Posted by snydpie on 7/26/2014 4:01:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bmamba2942 on 7/26/2014 4:22:00 AM (view original):
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 10:21:00 PM (view original):
Bmamba's team is:

PG. Spurs 11-12
SG. Bucks 05-06
SF. Spurs 84-85
PF. Hawks 03-04
C. Lakers 90-91
I'd like a redraw on this team
Bmamba, your redraw is:

PG. Warriors 79-80
SG. T-Wolves 90-91
SF. Sonics 07-08
PF. Kings 74-75
C. Stars 68-69
Wow...I can't field anything close to competitive with that. Is it okay if I just stick with that first team? No redraws
7/26/2014 11:17 PM
Posted by snydpie on 7/26/2014 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by snydpie on 7/24/2014 9:45:00 PM (view original):
Robusk's team is:

PG. Lakers 81-82
SG. Jazz 85-86
SF. Jazz 83-84
PF. Pistons 00-01
C. Hawks 01-02
Robusk, your redraw is:

PG. Nets 80-81
SG. Bucks 79-80
SF. Clippers 97-98
PF. Hawks 13-14
C. Braves 77-78
This is a ******* disaster.
7/27/2014 3:01 AM
Posted by snydpie on 7/26/2014 4:26:00 PM (view original):
Posted by robusk on 7/26/2014 8:56:00 AM (view original):
Snydpie, your random five are:
PG: 79/80 Spurs
SG: 01/02 Grizzlies
SF: 11/12 Wizards
PF: 77/78 Cavaliers
C: 74/75 Nets

I will take a redraw and a 2nd team also
Redraw is:
PG:70/71 Nets 
SG: 57/58 Nationals
SF: 90/91 Warriors
PF: 53/54 Lakers
C: 10/11 Knicks
7/27/2014 3:03 AM
Second team first draw is:
PG: 09/10 Hawks
SG: 93/94 Bullets
SF: 11/12 Spurs
PF: 82/83 Bullets      
C: 80/81 Blazers
7/27/2014 3:05 AM
Posted by robusk on 7/27/2014 3:05:00 AM (view original):
Second team first draw is:
PG: 09/10 Hawks
SG: 93/94 Bullets
SF: 11/12 Spurs
PF: 82/83 Bullets      
C: 80/81 Blazers
I only have 2 PG's and they only play 36 mins LMFAO.

This just isn't working out Dalton. This town isn't big enough for the both of us.
7/27/2014 11:50 AM
I think we have come to an impasse fellas..........
7/27/2014 11:53 AM
It's mind boggling and ridiculous how far off the 100% effective is on every position in the sim. There are PG's who shouldn't be 100% at SG. There are a lot of SG's who should be 100% at SF. There are SG's who shouldn't be 100% at PG. There are a lot of SF's who shouldn't be 100% at SG. There are SF's who should be 100% at SG. There are SF's who shouldn't be 100% at PF. There are SF's who should be 100% at PF. There are PF's who are 100% at SF who shouldn't be. There are a lot of PF's who aren't 100% at C who should be. The C position is probably the most accurate although there are still some C's who should be 100% at PF and some who shouldn't be.

Why is LeBron 100% at PG but Pippen & Grant Hill aren't?

Why are SF like Dantley who never played SG 100% effective? He never played SG and was way too slow to defend SG's not to mention he was a post player who couldn't handle well and had no shooting range. Because he was undersized they assume he played SG lol. The position effective should be decided with a players ability not height.

Why aren't Thorpe, Oakley, & Antonio Davis 100% at C along with many others? There are many other PF's who should be 100% at C especially from the 80's and 90's and there are many PF's who are very questionable or shouldn't be at 100% especially since the late 90's to the present.? Most of the C's in the NBA now are really PF's, and most PF's are SF's. The players in the NBA today are soft.

The defensive rankings are really screwed up also. Otis Thorpe was one of the best if not the best defensive PF in the NBA his whole career and he is in the 30's or low 40's in the sim because he played with Olajuwon LMFAO. Thorpe should be in the 80's-90's range at the very least. When Olajuwon went out of the game Thorpe would D up the best opposing C's better than any other PF's in the game. Why? Because he was one of the best defensive PF/C's in the NBA. The same goes for Bill Laimbeer. He was an excellent defensive player on a great defensive team. Laimbeer should be in the 70's not the 30's.

The biggest joke of all is Bill Russell. He is easily one of the top 2 greatest defensive C's to ever play the game and his defensive rankings in the sim are absolutely ridiculous. The other greatest being Olajuwon obviously!

These are just a few of the ridiculous mistakes. I haven't even mentioned the players who are rated way too high like Larry Nance LMFAO what a joke! Larry Nance a defensive stopper lol. I don't think so. Not even close.

There are many other horrible defensive rankings that are way off also. The biggest problem I have with the defensive rankings is that if a player blocks a lot of shots their rankings are a lot of times way too high. Just because you can block shots doesn't always make you a great defensive player. Don't get me wrong, there are some great shot blockers who also were great defensive players like Mutombo but a lot of these players in the 2000's are way overrated defensively. I would love to see them try to defend Jordan, Dream, Bird, Malone, Barkley, Robinson and many other greats from the 80's & 90's.

Anyways I'm done with my rant but I would love to hear your responses.
7/27/2014 11:45 PM
So....we still on?
7/29/2014 8:29 PM
I think this thread might be a little intimidating for newcomers at this point with so many pages
7/30/2014 10:36 AM
I'm in
7/30/2014 12:04 PM
Posted by bigkochman on 7/30/2014 12:04:00 PM (view original):
I'm in
Bigkochman, your team is;

PG. T-Blazers 98-99
SG. Pistons 09-10
SF. Pacers 10-11
PF. Pistons 94-95
C. Pistons 03-04
7/31/2014 9:12 PM
Hell I'm HAPPY with that!
8/1/2014 2:16 AM
Sooo....is this league dead? If so I'm going to use the team I bought for it for something else.
8/10/2014 4:58 PM
◂ Prev 1...10|11|12
Random 5 (47 mil.) - (14 in) Revised Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2018 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.