I need some advice here. Bear with me because there's some backstory.
I only have a half season of experience in HD, but 14 years in fantasy dynasty leagues. And I'm damn good at fantasy baseball. There are definitely some differences, but I have some knowledge, I enjoy HD so far, and am eager to learn how to become really good at it. That takes trial and error.
I joined the 7yankees7 league. They had one team left, so I took it. The team has some pretty high priced older players, some with horrible contracts. The minor league system is bare also.
My plan was to acquire some decent minor leaguers who were ready to be productive ML players so I could compete at a ML level while still reducing salary. I was looking for young (21-25 year olds), controllable players with solid defensive stats and 69-73 OVR levels. Meanwhile, I would max out my international prospect and scouting funds, max out my HS scouting fund (the league average there has historically been lower than college), and look to rebuild the lower and mid minors with some high end talent. I'd have a large surplus of ML payroll that I could also use to purchase more prospects or other players to keep me competitive until I got some prospects developed. All of the above has come from me religiously reading the forums and studying a lot of the top HD players.
So I moved quickly. I set up 5 different trades for my 6 highest salaried players, including one superstar, and in return was to receive 14 players - all but two ranked 69 to 75, with solid defense and OBP skills for offensive players, and good control and stamina for the pitchers. The other two players were lower level, high ceiling, blue-chip guys. Oh, I also had $17 million coming my way.
The league has just turned over. I had to wait two days before I could submit these trades officially (still in the budget phase). I made sure I kept the other owners apprised of who I still had available. Suddenly, the commissioner stepped in on the message board and basically told me I couldn’t honor those trades. He said he had wanted to make an offer (but had yet to do so). I said I had already agreed to those trades.
His words – “As a player with zero seasons under your belt, for the long term good of the league, we as a league need to make sure you are getting the best value for the trades you are making. You have four top flight players that you should maximize value for. Until budgets are finalized, you won’t even know the projected ratings of the players you are trading for.” Additionally: “…as a league we cannot go along with a situation where someone unwisely guts his team and then leaves.”
My issues are these: 1) if I already made good faith deals with other owners, then why should the commissioner encourage me – publically – not to honor those deals? 2) If he is publically saying he is going to make an offer for these same players, isn’t he being a little out of line? 3) He doesn’t even know what I negotiated. So how can judge before the fact if I got a good return? 4) If they are eventually agreed to, submitted, do they not go through the veto process? Isn’t the protest trade framework there to protect against this? And isn't it up to the league rather than an individual?
And finally, 5) his argument is that I am a newbie, and that he assumes I have already made bad, lopsided trades that will give other teams a big advantage. He mentions that I won’t know anything until ‘projected ratings’ for prospects come out. Aren’t these based on Advanced Scouting? I already bottomed out my budget for advanced scouting. Through the forum and some mentoring, I have been taught to evaluate prospects based on year to year improvements of players. ‘Projected stats’ are unreliable. So why is a well heeled veteran player telling a ‘newbie’ that he needs projected stats to evaluate trades when just about every good HD player ignores them?
Look, I get the patient, field 1000 offers and get the best deal thing. But I am someone who historically moves fast to allow myself maximum time to make adjustments. I think every owner should be allowed to do their thing and learn their own methods. I don’t see me dumping a team and creating unfair advantages when there are things in place to prevent such things (such as the veto).
Thoughts?