I created and chose Marlins based on 90m cap. I am assuming the 2 versions of each team rule was to provide enough quality team choices. If someone chose a horrible team isn't that their choice....not a reason to switch cap?

With higher/lower/same all hovering around 1/3 mark I am unclear why that would spark a change. I think presently 63% voted against a lower cap.

Just my thoughts

Agree, since we spent so much time designing the teams at 90 million and have waited, would like it to stay at 90 million. thanks. In fact the different teams we designed while trying to pick a mlb team were sampled at 90 million. Thanks

Posted by dn3524 on 11/9/2015 10:07:00 AM (view original):
I created and chose Marlins based on 90m cap. I am assuming the 2 versions of each team rule was to provide enough quality team choices. If someone chose a horrible team isn't that their choice....not a reason to switch cap?

With higher/lower/same all hovering around 1/3 mark I am unclear why that would spark a change. I think presently 63% voted against a lower cap.

Just my thoughts

I did not choose a sh*tty team by accident
Just a Phillies fan.

In the grand scheme of things IDC
But deferring to those who drank and drafted at a certain cap, I would side with them that the $ posted should be what is followed. I hold no illusions, I'll win 90, but Sparky HAS a sense of humor......

My vote is 90.

From:midknight
To:sjh0825Received:11/9/2015 5:09:00 PMSubject:RE: 2015 Twist and Shout Franchise League

Message:
Agree would like to keep it at $90

I'll take Miller Park

Posted by cpdpoet on 11/9/2015 4:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dn3524 on 11/9/2015 10:07:00 AM (view original):
I created and chose Marlins based on 90m cap. I am assuming the 2 versions of each team rule was to provide enough quality team choices. If someone chose a horrible team isn't that their choice....not a reason to switch cap?

With higher/lower/same all hovering around 1/3 mark I am unclear why that would spark a change. I think presently 63% voted against a lower cap.

Just my thoughts

I did not choose a sh*tty team by accident
Just a Phillies fan.

In the grand scheme of things IDC
But deferring to those who drank and drafted at a certain cap, I would side with them that the $ posted should be what is followed. I hold no illusions, I'll win 90, but Sparky HAS a sense of humor......

My vote is 90.

yeah, I was not taking a shot at you or anything, in fact, I figured if you wanted Philly it was not with allusions of winning, but because that's your team and that would make the league the most fun for you, which is how it should be

My angels team will use their home stadium.

I will go with Safeco

I know I voiced my opinion on cap change, but I will adjust either way.

As per my sitemail to current owners, the cap will remain at 90 million.  Thanks for everyone's input.  

The league number will be available soon.

I'll try the Cubs

If it helps I'll take the Pirates for a NL team

Posted by Jdh34 on 11/12/2015 12:15:00 AM (view original):

I'll take the Giants and for kicks we'll play in Dodger Stadium

How are combined players treated?  aka the Giants and Mike Leake?  Do I use only the portion he played for Giants or can I use the combined?

You are allowed to use combined stats. Just make sure the team name is valid for your player to fit into the rules.

Don't you guys envy me going through 24 rosters to see which players are allowed? Yikes!

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES!! IF IN DOUBT, ASK! LOL.

Phillies are gonna grab Yankee Stadium III