Dang, this is filling up quickly. League Number hockey?

It's a great theme. I've had a hard time understanding why more owners don't play in these $60M themes.

I don't get it either...It is so much more challenging and interesting...

I will take the Browns. They will be perfect at $60 million...they were so bad.

I'll jump in as the other Phillies franchise....thx

Rickysdad and Lew... The consensus seems to be that folks don't like the random luck of the draw with the minor league. I love it, and the managing is so much more fun. I have to check-in 3-times a day to make sure my club is managed or there's no chance of winning these things.

I'll take the Senators

Poly...I wish that we wouldn't even get triple A players unless they were ex-major leaguers who were perennial minor leaguers(meaning less than 25 PA's or 10 IP's in the majors)...They should truly just be human blow-out patches...

Dgallo, I wouldn't be apposed to "bad" AAA actually being rotten. But I think it would be cool for each team to get one "medium" AAA option. Because let's face it, baseball always has a minor league phenom. And I like your idea for what-if to use your suggestion, but it'll never happen. Neither of what we'd like will ever happen. SO... make the most of the options knowing what you'll get and manage based on it.

I have a team of Philly/KC A's ready to go. Just need the league # ...

TOP

There are fewer 200K players since the pricing update, so perhaps the 200K rule needs to be reconsidered.

Posted by hockeyhead on 5/17/2016 2:08:00 PM (view original):
.

I haven't check on that. Would $250K be any help?

Yes