What is ... Topic

a_in_the_b
Posts: 1653 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 18 570 3
Pro
... this highest distribution you have ever given to a player in a game and not had him take a single shot or shoot a single free throw in twenty minutes or more?

Isn't putting a seventeen in and a player attempting nothing whatsoever a bit odd?
5/11/2016 6:25 PM
yanks250125
Posts: 859 (0)
Hall of Famer
235 35 19 5 418 44
Prospect
how many minutes?
5/11/2016 6:28 PM
a_in_the_b
Posts: 1653 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 18 570 3
Pro
twenty.
5/11/2016 6:30 PM
a_in_the_b
Posts: 1653 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 18 570 3
Pro
https://www.whatifsports.com/hd/GameResults/BoxScore.aspx?gid=13157963
5/11/2016 6:31 PM
dahsdebater
Posts: 10036 (0)
Hall of Famer
284 270 18
Pro
It's even the PG, so he would typically get fouled at least once or twice just by handling the ball.
5/11/2016 6:36 PM
dahsdebater
Posts: 10036 (0)
Hall of Famer
284 270 18
Pro
I guess it was against a zone...
5/11/2016 6:39 PM
a_in_the_b
Posts: 1653 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 18 570 3
Pro
Still mighty odd.
5/11/2016 6:42 PM
therewas47
Posts: 657 (0)
Hall of Famer
127 1
Prospect
It is odd. I used to do Sr night and for my last game of the season versus a sim I'd distribute up evenly between my seniors to get 100
5/11/2016 9:21 PM
Trentonjoe
Posts: 10962 (2)
Hall of Famer
390 589 54 1
Hall of Famer
My guess it is due to the PG's 35 ATH.....my 3-2 zone averaged more than 30 more than that. Your poor PG couldn't get an open look.
5/11/2016 9:34 PM
MonsterTurtl
Posts: 986 (0)
Hall of Famer
203 1
Rookie
What were your other distribution numbers, it's a ratio
5/11/2016 10:18 PM
a_in_the_b
Posts: 1653 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 18 570 3
Pro
21, two 17's including him, some tens, and various other single digit numbers.
Regardless, I have trouble thinking of another set of numbers in ratio that equate to taking no shots whatsoever other than with a really freaky roll of the dice.

5/11/2016 11:29 PM
Trentonjoe
Posts: 10962 (2)
Hall of Famer
390 589 54 1
Hall of Famer
Your team took 50 shots, he was in the game for 20 minutes so let's assume he was in for 25. His relative ratio was about a quarter? So in a vacuum he should have taken about 6? Seems odd but not unreasonable given the 3-2 zone and ath difference
5/12/2016 8:25 AM
arssanguinus
Posts: 1120 (0)
Hall of Famer
245 1
Pro
Closer to 31% given the lineups involved.
5/12/2016 10:44 AM
scaturo
Posts: 304 (0)
All Star
5 29
Prospect
So he was expected to take closer to 7 or 8 shots? I think this shows the suppression factor of the 3-2 on guards.
5/12/2016 11:51 AM
arssanguinus
Posts: 1120 (0)
Hall of Famer
245 1
Pro
I'm not complaining, mind, or saying things are unjust, just trying to noodle through something which is an oddity in my mind to see if I can think of ways to suppress or utilize the oddity.
5/12/2016 12:14 PM
12 Next ▸
What is ... Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.