This coach in my conference apparently has an issue with how I schedule my non-conference. He says I schedule terribly every season. I would disagree. I scheduled weak this season (no denying that) but I explained how I only had 5 guys returning this yr and with the unpredictability of recruiting I had to schedule like this in case I ended up with only like 3 or 4 guys in my class (my class ended up being pretty nice but that is beside the point of the argument). I ended up non-conf. 8-2 with 2 bad losses to SIM coached teams most likely because the IQ on my team is very low right now. However, this coach says I schedule like **** every season and hurt all the other teams in the conference. When I schedule I try to find winnable games with teams who will have solid RPI by seasons end and schedule a few tough ones usually so I can get 8-10 non-conference wins because in a BIG 6 conference you need to make sure you can have enough to get to that 14 win requirement for the NT.
I then pointed out to him how our SOS have compared since he joined the conference (by the way we are in the same division of the conference so we play virtually the exact same in conference schedule other than playing against each other). Here is how our SOS have compared over the 7 complete seasons the coach has been in the conference:
SOS
Season 87: Me 32 Him 12
Season 88: Me 41 Him 35
Season 89: Me 13 Him 34
Season 90: Me 37 Him 52
Season 91: Me 41 Him 48
Season 92: Me 62 Him 43
Season 93: Me 39 Him 51
That is 4 of 7 seasons where I had the better SOS, with an aggregate of 265 for Me vs. 275 for Him. He then told me a proper analysis is looking at the SOS at the end of non-conference play, but I disagree since the teams you are playing RPI is NOT static thus the SOS you accrued against them continues to change throughout the season. He went onto say I am hurting all the other teams RPI in the conference because of this. So I did a little RPI comparison as well:
RPI
Season 87: Me 43 Him 50
Season 88: Me 22 Him 62
Season 89: Me 12 Him 37
Season 90: Me 40 Him 93
Season 91: Me 33 Him 43
Season 92: Me 25 Him 32
Season 93: Me 28 Him 44
That is a better RPI than him in all 7 seasons. But according to him I am "hurting" other teams in our conference while him and the other teams that schedule well are helping us "bad schedulers" out. Since I have a better RPI wouldn't when a team plays me a win against me helps them more and a loss against me hurts them less? I don't see in his logic how I am a detriment to our conference. Before I got to this school they had seen 2 NT appearances in the previous 30 seasons and now I am pretty much making it in the NT every season. Can someone explain to me after this comparison how my team is hurting the conference so much while his is helping so much more than mine? No doubt this guy is a great coach with 6 NT championships to his credit and I am 0-3 in NT championship games, but damn I am not seeing his point on this. The dude is basically calling me a dumbass without saying it so I want to see where I am wrong on this because I am 99.9% sure I am NOT wrong. Thanks.
5/18/2016 5:06 PM (edited)