D2/SF?
Triangle/Zone

ATH:78
SPEED:58
REB:20
DEF: 86
Block:14
LP:23
PER:38
BH:61
PASS:41
FT: B-

what's his potential? especially in SPD, BH, PER...maybe a SG, but other than that he sucks except for being a decent defender

Yeah he is a defender, I'd start him at SF in 3-2. If I was good at REB at PF/C, I'd start it at SF at 2-3 also. Do you have any scoring at the 2 and the 1 spots? And a PF, or C scorer..?

He is over 200... So he is definetly a solid defender in zone DII

That's him developed.

Posted by zorzii on 7/28/2016 8:25:00 PM (view original):
Yeah he is a defender, I'd start him at SF in 3-2. If I was good at REB at PF/C, I'd start it at SF at 2-3 also. Do you have any scoring at the 2 and the 1 spots? And a PF, or C scorer..?

He is over 200... So he is definetly a solid defender in zone DII

He's a 4th/5th scoring option.

He is very handsome.

Plug in at the 3, low distro. He will help a lot.

He looks like a decent defensive SF and nothing else, thought he was a good D3 defender at first

If either his rebound or pass was 20-25 points higher you would have a nice defender plus okay non-scoring cores.

I would say say rebound kinda needs to get up to be a helpful SF and Pass needs to get up for him to play SG.

Amazes me how people can have such disparate opinions on this game. I've never run zone, but I can tell you he'd be a very nice press player.

He would not have played for my DII zone team. I wanted more speed and pass and some more offense. I looked at rebounding as nothing more than a bonus. He's a guy I would play on a team I took over but I would not have recruited that guy for anything other than a backup, maybe.

Great player to help build a program but not to make a run. IMHO