Trivial issue...there still no Overall Record listed on a Coaches' profile, just his separate Home and Away.

hope seble looks at this or otherwise asks for glitch info beyond the beta board

When you click on old players you get an error. Also there are many players improving pts but the only way to tell is through ratings history. It isn't showing on their profiles.

Posted by therewas47 on 8/25/2016 8:38:00 AM (view original):
When you click on old players you get an error. Also there are many players improving pts but the only way to tell is through ratings history. It isn't showing on their profiles.

Some improvements show up, others don't. I think the main player page and the season change team page are using a different rounding algorithm than the ratings history player page.

Why is there no sorting by attribute on the actual team ratings screen? I used that constantly in the old HD.

Went straight to Home page without hiding game one results. (Beta test had a way to go to the PbP. Wooden 3.0 World.

wvufan76,

Please make sure you have your user setting set to "Hide Score" for the Game Results Setting section.

Posted by bbunch on 8/25/2016 5:23:00 PM (view original):
Why is there no sorting by attribute on the actual team ratings screen? I used that constantly in the old HD.

generally, needs better sorting and filtering - less useful than in classic game

views like depth chart and player game plan should stick if you change to current stats - now defaults back to ratings. If you change say one players setting and save it you then have to click again to get back to current stats

better design would make that selection stick

any sign that WIS is looking at these reports?

Metsmax,

That should be fixed now.

bbunch & fd343ny,

By the Team Ratings page did you mean Rankings - TeamRatings? Also where else are you seeing that there needs to be better sorting and filtering?

Posted by fd343ny on 8/31/2016 7:59:00 AM (view original):
any sign that WIS is looking at these reports?

You mean something like Site Staff posting just three posts above yours? Or twice since then?

spud you are absolutely correct - site staff had posted once - about one item - so a better post by me would have been

"any sign that WIS is looking at these reports other than the one item that site staff commented about"

I very much appreciate your post and the enlightenment that it has provided and hope that you will continue to post such profound messages.

I also regret that at the time of my post I was not aware of the subsequent posts by site staff. My bad.

Well, okay then. Straighten up and fly right, eh?