jt7king - What does my definition of the New America have to do with politics?

So now it's my fault that I point out the OBVIOUS - apparently some get easily offended when confronted with the truth --- and their quintessential response is to make an illogical retort thinking their witty in doing so -- when in reality, all they've done is validate the very premise of my original statement.

Obviously they don't get it - but that's because logical thinking is not something they've been able to grasp as they've endeavored down life's course.

well 14-15 curry made the last two championships and his 15-16 is even better...so wilt may have some competition soon for most dominant in the league

in fact im very surprised hoopsdude and ysw didnt want to try him out first

Posted by dh555 on 5/23/2016 7:07:00 PM (view original):
sly...hold off on posting your pick


i will wait to see if others think im being unfair...please vote everyone

I have been ;-)

actaully...you, thomcat, and jh can pick if youd like since your draft spot isnt affected by milest/leibo

I'm enjoying all the commentary.

jt7king -- there is a clear difference between having an advantage - and having a pre-determined outcome --- the record in this league evidences that Chamberlain's 66-67 season all but assures a championship.

I never said eliminate Chamberlain or anyone else -- your suggesting otherwise is nothing more than upside-down thinking.

Frankly, I'm surprised others haven't seen the corollary that equals Chamberlain's 66-67 season to championships

QUERRY - how many time do you need to see the same thing to determine that a minor tweak would enhance competitiveness.

PS - I'M AS FAR RIGHT AS YOU CAN GO - you just are having trouble understanding the simplicity of my comments.

Posted by dh555 on 5/23/2016 7:50:00 PM (view original):
actaully...you, thomcat, and jh can pick if youd like since your draft spot isnt affected by milest/leibo

Gotcha- I'll go with Kevin Durant. Can someone please sm for me if they can sort through all the other nonsense

Posted by pennsylvania on 5/23/2016 7:44:00 PM (view original):
jt7king - What does my definition of the New America have to do with politics?

So now it's my fault that I point out the OBVIOUS - apparently some get easily offended when confronted with the truth --- and their quintessential response is to make an illogical retort thinking their witty in doing so -- when in reality, all they've done is validate the very premise of my original statement.

Obviously they don't get it - but that's because logical thinking is not something they've been able to grasp as they've endeavored down life's course.

Yes pen it's your fault for pointing out the obvious. Shame on you, I am offended.
But if I just CAPITALIZE words every ONCE in a while than maybe I can be as RIGHT as you are.

I've offered one man's opioion - others are entitled to theirs --- THE DIFFERENCE BEING my comments are supported by the string of championships won with Chamberlain 66-67 at the forefront.

There is certainly a difference between being in the championship and WINNING ---- Chamberlain 66-67 wins -- all but every time -- that is indisputable


AND THAT IS MY POINT

Round 1 - Untimed

1. hoopsdude - Wilt Chamberlain
2. ysw128 - LeBron James
3. amerk1180 - Stephen Curry
4. cjok1051 - Kareem Abdul-Jabbar
5. uptowngbv - Chris Paul
6. jkaye24 - Michael Jordan
7. jcred5 - Shaquille O'Neal
8. vancem - Moses Malone
9. maglor1 - David Robinson
10. jt7king - Dennis Rodman
11. dh555 - Dwight Howard
12. slymonium - Kevin Durant
13. thomcat - Karl Malone
14. jhsukow - can pick anytime
15. mikee1 - draft is paused at this point until the poll is finished
16. bds9992
17. omegax
18. eleibowitz
19. milest
20. longtallbrad
21. copernicus
22. samuelyork93
23. pennsylvania
24. banditone

Posted by pennsylvania on 5/23/2016 7:51:00 PM (view original):
jt7king -- there is a clear difference between having an advantage - and having a pre-determined outcome --- the record in this league evidences that Chamberlain's 66-67 season all but assures a championship.

I never said eliminate Chamberlain or anyone else -- your suggesting otherwise is nothing more than upside-down thinking.

Frankly, I'm surprised others haven't seen the corollary that equals Chamberlain's 66-67 season to championships

QUERRY - how many time do you need to see the same thing to determine that a minor tweak would enhance competitiveness.

PS - I'M AS FAR RIGHT AS YOU CAN GO - you just are having trouble understanding the simplicity of my comments.

No way. You're conservative? Huh, I don't think you've ever mentioned that. Not sure why you are so obsessed with this socialist agenda of banning one season of Wilt then.

alright...im out for awhile

ill revisit this mess tomorrow around 6 or 7pm and get it sorted out

dont forget to vote please...poll is on page 4

Meanwhile, consistent with "advanced thinking", I take:

Karl Malone

jt7king - it's not a socialist agenda - it's an alternative to insanity -

CAUTION - POLITICAL COMMENTARY FOLLOWS:

It's similar to those individuals living in inner cities who have continually voted for Dems over the last 60 years and wonder why it is that EVERY inner city in America is fraught with crime, drugs, public school's that can't teach kids to read and write - let alone graduate -- rampant poverty and unemployment---- and yet those same people do the same thing OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER --- AND NOTHING CHANGES - including their ******** and moaning over the very things they continue to request by voting for MORE OF THE SAME.

INSANITY at it's finest.

Then again, this won't be the first time I see things completely different than others -- despite the facts -- ACTUAL championships won with Chamberlain's 66-67 season