Posted by tangplay on 11/13/2017 5:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by sjpoker on 11/12/2017 7:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/12/2017 4:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DougOut on 11/12/2017 2:30:00 PM (view original):
That money had to come from somewhere.

We now know it was Hillary and the DemoNazis.

The DemoNazis love their enemies more than their friends and neighbors.

Wicked.

Proof?

You may be one of the few users that doesn't have that conspiracy wingnut blocked. Don't waste your time arguing with that inbred.

I have him blocked.

I'm guessing only 3 or 4 DON'T have him blocked.

Posted by sjpoker on 11/14/2017 12:12:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/13/2017 5:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by sjpoker on 11/12/2017 7:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/12/2017 4:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DougOut on 11/12/2017 2:30:00 PM (view original):
That money had to come from somewhere.

We now know it was Hillary and the DemoNazis.

The DemoNazis love their enemies more than their friends and neighbors.

Wicked.

Proof?

You may be one of the few users that doesn't have that conspiracy wingnut blocked. Don't waste your time arguing with that inbred.

I have him blocked.

I'm guessing only 3 or 4 DON'T have him blocked.

I never block. Only cowards block.

No, blocking is a great tool. It’s useful on nutjobs like Doug but it’s also great when someone is exceptionally stupid. all3 and jtpsops come to mind. When I blocked jtpsops he got so mad that he started sitemailing me.

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 9:15:00 AM (view original):
No, blocking is a great tool. It’s useful on nutjobs like Doug but it’s also great when someone is exceptionally stupid. all3 and jtpsops come to mind. When I blocked jtpsops he got so mad that he started sitemailing me.

If you use it as a tool for annoyance or to rid yourself of annoying parasites rather than dodging an intellectual debate then I see your point. I take back my statement.

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 9:15:00 AM (view original):
No, blocking is a great tool. It’s useful on nutjobs like Doug but it’s also great when someone is exceptionally stupid. all3 and jtpsops come to mind. When I blocked jtpsops he got so mad that he started sitemailing me.

Wow, the King of WIS Stupidity tries to call others out. Now I've seen it all.

I'll give you credit for a couple things b_l: you never run from an argument by pretending to block someone, and you defend your stupidity vigorously no matter how many people beat you down and/or correct you.

He voted for HRC....let those actions speak for themselves.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 11:37:00 AM (view original):
He voted for HRC....let those actions speak for themselves.

The only other realistic option was trump and...well...we all see how that's going. Clinton would have been a MUCH better choice.

Posted by all3 on 11/14/2017 10:02:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 9:15:00 AM (view original):
No, blocking is a great tool. It’s useful on nutjobs like Doug but it’s also great when someone is exceptionally stupid. all3 and jtpsops come to mind. When I blocked jtpsops he got so mad that he started sitemailing me.

Wow, the King of WIS Stupidity tries to call others out. Now I've seen it all.

I'll give you credit for a couple things b_l: you never run from an argument by pretending to block someone, and you defend your stupidity vigorously no matter how many people beat you down and/or correct you.

I'll never block you all3. Never.

I voted for HRC too and it really pained me to do so. I really dislike her, but she is still better than what we got (not by a lot, I admit)

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 11:39:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 11:37:00 AM (view original):
He voted for HRC....let those actions speak for themselves.

The only other realistic option was trump and...well...we all see how that's going. Clinton would have been a MUCH better choice.

Explain why

Posted by wylie715 on 11/14/2017 12:59:00 PM (view original):
I voted for HRC too and it really pained me to do so. I really dislike her, but she is still better than what we got (not by a lot, I admit)

Neither of our votes counted.

HRC said she lost because boyfriends and husbands told their significant others "see she is crook" so she lost a lot of the women vote. LOL. So she thinks women are still sheep and listen to their men in terms of how to vote. She is the worst.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 1:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 11:39:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 11:37:00 AM (view original):
He voted for HRC....let those actions speak for themselves.

The only other realistic option was trump and...well...we all see how that's going. Clinton would have been a MUCH better choice.

Explain why

Explain what? That Trump's incompetent? Or corrupt? Or compromised?

It's very evident that Trump is 100% incapable of doing this job. He isn't smart or tough or a good negotiator. He isn't a good manager or decision maker. He's circus showman...a guy who can leverage emotions and use them to his advantage. That's it. That's the extent of his skill set.

That doesn't make a good president.

Clinton, on the other hand was bad at leveraging emotions. She wasn't terribly likable. But she was very capable and qualified for the job.

Kinda like the "Merkle" of America. Old and doughty, shifty and fishy as hell, but a competent bureaucrat who wouldn't have steered us into a cliff recklessly.
Personally, I'm more of a risk taker than some, I'd like to see us throw out the ruling parties for a term and elect somebody else......... like a Gary Johnson. I couldn't cared less he forgot the name of a big city in Syria. I couldn't name more than a handful of cities in the mideast myself,,,,,,,,,,, B.F.D.
Had nothing to do with whether or not he'd have been a good head of state.