Are non-AAA OLs suddenly going to become immune to high #OBP guys, or deadball era pitchers, or switch-hitters, or high % SB speedsters, etc.? Of course not.
No, but that isn't/wasn't the goal behind removing AAA. And I don't think anyone has made an argument that this would be the case.
As for the rest, I don't disagree in terms of cookies in low caps, but it also doesn't address the point I was making, nor do I see the relevance to my point, as such things also exist in wide and narrow player pools. My point was that low cap leagues see just as much variation in league types and draft strategies as open and high cap leagues.
I do somewhat disagree on the effect of dynamic pricing and AAA turning OL into low cap leagues. Dynamic pricing didn't get people to start drafting guys who would have never been competitively useable in OL (1899 Frank Bates) that are useable in low caps. It shifted use of a minority of players who seemed to be relative bargains to players whose pricing is still the same. Look at 1889 Lou Bierbauer. Prior to dynamic pricing he had zero uses. Now he has 30+ Bierbauer isn't a low cap player, he's perfectly suited for the OL level. You're still drafting for $80m with $80m and filling it with players whose salaries are and always have been players suited for $80m. It just priced that minority of players up and out of reach for most OL teams because they could also be viable in higher cap leagues where the player pool is more limited. AAA doesn't have an impact on drafting for the league in terms of cap value. I've gone over the value breakdown in depth in another thread related to AAA trading and again in a thread related to OL Salary Cap.