JUST WHAT IS IN THOSE TAX RETURNS, MITTENS? Topic

Posted by antoncresten on 8/4/2012 5:49:00 PM (view original):

To the untrained eye this is just another class warfare pitch from the left.

In reality this is what is pulling Romney ahead.

Anyone who works for a living, or owns a business of a farm. Anyone who is doing well is the problem according to Obama.

So if you have a few dollars in your pocket 4 more years of Obama will solve that.

8/4/2012 6:41 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by antoncresten on 8/4/2012 7:21:00 PM (view original):
And no husbands. Even societies that allowed multiple wives didnt allow more husbands.

The bottom line is are we going to allow the Federal Government to overrule the will of the people on every issue?
8/4/2012 11:06 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by antoncresten on 8/5/2012 6:09:00 AM (view original):
And of course compared to Bush and Dole Clinton's draft status was relevant.

Kerry was very much a flip flopper compared to the steady worldview that Bush had.

And asking for documents to make his ability to be Preseident were relevant at the time.

Now of course we have a man with a solid history of support of the Military and a man with a hostile history towards the Military.

We have a man who's personal views were not always in line with the policies of a liberal state he was in charge of, and a man who abandoned almost all of his campaign pledges.

We have a person who 3 years into his administration we still know very little about his controversial school history, and a man who the left wants maore proof that he is rich to bash him with.
8/5/2012 5:59 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by antoncresten on 8/5/2012 6:01:00 PM (view original):
And it is hard to imagine anything worse than 4 more of Obama.

Just having someone in office who is scared of the Tea Party would make a huge difference. The idea that a President wouldnt raise taxes first as a response to a budget issue. A President that is more worried about controling spending that in expanding the scope of Government.

And finally what kind of America will will end up with after all the picks Obama will make for the SC. 2 or 3 more of his picks will lock a whole generation in to forced socialism and the end of any kind of religious based value system.
8/5/2012 7:44 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
1 The ADA is becoming a bloated law. Limiting a specific aspect of it probably shows a good choice for President.

2 Ask the Company who is installing the elevator if it is a good thing. Ask all the people who are going to be able to feed their children because of their job. I know that you need to paint Romney as an out of touch moron in order to win this election with Obama's horrible record.

In order to win you need Obama to be thought of as a snob. You dont care about the jobs he creates or the good he does in the world.
8/5/2012 7:59 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
We need a businessman in the whitehouse because it is much better than a Euro-Socialist.

We need someone who respects the fact that the government needs to spend on some things, but should never overspend when not needed. We need someone who looks at the business in America as a friend of the people, and not an enemy, like your pic implies.

We need someone who makes decisions based on people, and not on spotted owls, chickens and cows.

We need someone who is more worried about how much Americans are paying for gas, and less about how much they can seize from oil companies.

We need someone who does not think of a rich persons money as untaxed revenue for the government.

Ths is why we need a businessman, and not someone who has never had a real job.

8/5/2012 9:47 PM
Posted by swamphawk22 on 8/5/2012 5:59:00 PM (view original):
Posted by antoncresten on 8/5/2012 6:09:00 AM (view original):
And of course compared to Bush and Dole Clinton's draft status was relevant.

Kerry was very much a flip flopper compared to the steady worldview that Bush had.

And asking for documents to make his ability to be Preseident were relevant at the time.

Now of course we have a man with a solid history of support of the Military and a man with a hostile history towards the Military.

We have a man who's personal views were not always in line with the policies of a liberal state he was in charge of, and a man who abandoned almost all of his campaign pledges.

We have a person who 3 years into his administration we still know very little about his controversial school history, and a man who the left wants maore proof that he is rich to bash him with.
You're right about one thing, Romney has always been hostile towards the military. Getting deferment after deferment during 'Nam, and then claiming recently that it was "frustrating" that he wasn't in 'Nam.

He's the squawking definition of a chicken hawk and he can't believe that there's no more soldiers dying in Iraq. He can't believe there's soldiers not dying yet in Iran or Syria, and he do his damnedest to ensure that that happens quickly.

He'll also roll back the recent military health benefits and roll back the new GI Bill.
8/6/2012 12:42 AM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
The military knows who has thier back. They always vote solidly Republican.

They want people who respect the institution of the Military and respect the soldiers.

You can try to sell your cause, but the members of the Military know!
8/6/2012 2:11 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
◂ Prev 1...16|17|18|19|20...29 Next ▸
JUST WHAT IS IN THOSE TAX RETURNS, MITTENS? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.