PTS/(FGA+TO+0.44*FTA) is a good metric, but a TO is worse than a missed shot.

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 10/16/2014 6:32:00 PM (view original):
PTS/(FGA+TO+0.44*FTA) is a good metric, but a TO is worse than a missed shot.

You're definitely correct, but I'm not sure how to weight that.  It'd probably depend on how well your team offensive rebounds, but I haven't gone that deep into the metrics.

I have a spreadsheet where I keep track of advanced statistics like those discussed for my teams.  Among the things I track is True Shooting%, eFG%, and Player Efficiency Rating.  I will be adding PPP to this after reading this thread.

The biggest question mark is how reliable PER is in evaluating a player in HD.  Since the traditional PER equation is not possible to calculate in HD (or if it is, isn't worth the trouble), I have to use a modified PER equation I found from this article.  Anyone have any input on how they think that translates into HD?  I have found that it pretty accurately rates who I consider my best players the highest, although it seems to overrate high volume shooters.

How about PTS+AST+REB+BLK+2*STL+0.5*3PM-2*TO-MissedFG-0.6*missedFT?