Posted by trsnoke on 7/4/2012 1:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 7/3/2012 10:25:00 PM (view original):
There's a chapter in "Baseball Between the Numbers" from Baseball Prospectus that talks about clutch hitting. The conclusion is that clutch hitting exists, but that it's very minor. And basically the "best" clutch hitters are the one with the best plate discipline . . . higher than average walk rate and lower than average strikeout rate.
Everything else is pretty much bullshit.
Do you remember what they measured? Defining what a clutch situation and clutch perfmance is is important in all this. It makes sense that good plate discipline guys are more successful but they should typically be more successful in every situation. Did the study try to measure whether those players "elevated their game" in those situations are just performed better than other groups did?
IIRC, that article was trying to answer the question of whether or not David Ortiz was a clutch hitter. They did it by looking to see if a clutch performance (I forget their measure for clutch) one season was predictive one in the next season.
My problem with clutch hitting is that every single player that has made it to MLB has been in countless clutch situations along the way. Sure the stakes are higher in the bottom of the 9th in Game 7 of the WS than HS, College, and MiL clutch situations, but I've got to believe that 90% of MLB players have learned how to shut out everything when they're hitting or pitching in any situation. I think of this:
www.youtube.com/watch