Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):
Yes, and I think we need to amend it when it comes to illegal border crossings. You disagree.

Some are pro choice others pro life.

I mean, I don't see you offering any ideas or solutions. Just complaints.

I wish we had a Great Wall visible from space with the naked eye...but, even if we did, those who slip through illegally would still be entitled to the due process the Constitution grants them. We can certainly amend the, what are they, the 5th and 14th amendments? Until we do, we can't ignore those clauses.

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Due process is a protection, not a deterrent. That’s the point.

Posted by tangplay on 6/25/2018 7:53:00 PM (view original):
I don't

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/25/2018 6:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Due process is a protection, not a deterrent. That’s the point.

This is 100% correct and bad_luck wins the unblock award. Border patrol, walls, etc. are deterrents. Sending someone back to their home country AFTER due process is a deterrent. Due process itself is neither a deterrent nor an incentive.

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 8:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/25/2018 6:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Due process is a protection, not a deterrent. That’s the point.

This is 100% correct and bad_luck wins the unblock award. Border patrol, walls, etc. are deterrents. Sending someone back to their home country AFTER due process is a deterrent. Due process itself is neither a deterrent nor an incentive.

Then we need to redifne due process because they are wasting taxpayer $$$.

What I am hearing is you all want the same old same old. Bad Luck thinks everything is working just fine. Ignorant he is.

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 8:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/25/2018 6:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Due process is a protection, not a deterrent. That’s the point.

This is 100% correct and bad_luck wins the unblock award. Border patrol, walls, etc. are deterrents. Sending someone back to their home country AFTER due process is a deterrent. Due process itself is neither a deterrent nor an incentive.

Then we need to redifne due process because they are wasting taxpayer $$$.

What I am hearing is you all want the same old same old. Bad Luck thinks everything is working just fine. Ignorant he is.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 8:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/25/2018 6:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Due process is a protection, not a deterrent. That’s the point.

This is 100% correct and bad_luck wins the unblock award. Border patrol, walls, etc. are deterrents. Sending someone back to their home country AFTER due process is a deterrent. Due process itself is neither a deterrent nor an incentive.

Then we need to redifne due process because they are wasting taxpayer $$$.

What I am hearing is you all want the same old same old. Bad Luck thinks everything is working just fine. Ignorant he is.

What do you mean, “redefine due process?”

You don’t seem to really understand what due process is.

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 10:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 8:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/25/2018 6:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 6:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/25/2018 5:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/25/2018 4:31:00 PM (view original):
Immigrants being arrested is not rare. Not sure what you’re talking about.

No your specific example is. Don’t play coy. You do that again and we are done conversing.

Is there an emoji for the jerk-off motion?

Any *specific* example is going to be relatively rare.

The likelihood the the border patrol would witness a US citizen crossing the border in a remote area without ID is obviously small. The point wasn’t that it would happen often, the point was that it could happen, period.

Without due process, that person is screwed. Due process protects us all.

Thank you for admitting your example sucked. So how would you fix it? Due Process is not working. People are not deterred. You don't want a wall. What do you want? Open borders?

I am saying for people who cross illegally we send them back. Period. Or we build the wall. Or we find a 3rd lever because what is happening currently is not working.

The flaw in your premise is that due process *does* work. What makes you think it doesn’t?

It is not a deterrent. People still insist on trying to sneak in illegally. Premise being the US is soft and will take them in.

Due process is a protection, not a deterrent. That’s the point.

This is 100% correct and bad_luck wins the unblock award. Border patrol, walls, etc. are deterrents. Sending someone back to their home country AFTER due process is a deterrent. Due process itself is neither a deterrent nor an incentive.

Then we need to redifne due process because they are wasting taxpayer $$$.

What I am hearing is you all want the same old same old. Bad Luck thinks everything is working just fine. Ignorant he is.

What do you mean, “redefine due process?”

You don’t seem to really understand what due process is.

Again with your one way thinking. Let me explain it to you. Due process would not apply to people illegally crossing into the US from Mexico but would apply in every other instance.

You still have not provided a solution. Useless you are.

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/25/2018 10:14:00 PM (view original):
Latching on to Trump's nutsack is a great way to make a quick buck. Worked for Stormy.