Tax Cuts Consequences Topic

Kansas City Southern (KCS) (NYSE: KSU) announced today that in response to congressional passage of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, it will immediately share some of the benefits with qualified, non-executive employees of its subsidiaries in the U.S. and Mexico in the form of a one-time $1,000 bonus payable by the end of 2017.
1/3/2018 5:21 AM
so are all these bonuses going to be handed out yearly? I keep seeing one time. the tax cuts are good every year, why not share the wealth every year?
1/3/2018 7:37 AM
Because other factors could come into play. No company promises bonuses for multiple years. But if things keep going well then the bonuses will likely continue.
1/3/2018 8:22 AM
It is a shame the middle class is getting ahead and are allowed to grow in numbers instead of Democrat socialist policies of having a rich elite and the peasant masses.
1/3/2018 3:56 PM

#fakenews


Middle-class Americans and the poor enjoyed their best year of economic improvement in decades in 2015, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday, a spike that broke a years-long streak of disappointment for American workers but did not fully repair the damage inflicted by the Great Recession.

Real median household income was $56,500 in 2015, the bureau reported, up from $53,700 in 2014. That 5.2 percent increase was the largest, in percentage terms, recorded by the bureau since it began tracking median income statistics in the 1960s.

In addition, the poverty rate fell by 1.2 percentage points, the steepest decline since 1968. There were 43.1 million Americans in poverty on the year, 3.5 million fewer than in 2014. The share of Americans who lack health insurance continued a years-long decline, falling 1.3 percentage points, to 9.1 percent.

A combination of forces fueled the gains, including an improving job market, low inflation and rising wages, particularly for low-earning workers who may have benefited from state and local initiatives to boost minimum wages.

[Things are getting a lot better for the working poor]

And while incomes increased for men and for women - with the income gap between the two genders narrowing slightly - and across racial and ethnic groups, they did not reach all workers evenly. Median incomes did not budge significantly in rural areas, while in cities, they grew by 7.3 percent. The South saw significantly weaker income growth than the West.

1/3/2018 4:18 PM

The incomes of middle-class Americans rose last year to the highest level ever recorded by the Census Bureau, as poverty declined and the scars of the past decade’s Great Recession seemed to finally fade.

Median household income rose to $59,039 in 2016, a 3.2 percent increase from the previous year and the second consecutive year of healthy gains, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday. The nation’s poverty rate fell to 12.7 percent, returning nearly to what it was in 2007 before a financial crisis and deep recession walloped workers in ways that were still felt years later.

The new data, along with another census report showing the rate of Americans lacking health insurance to be at its lowest ever last year, suggest that Americans were actually in a position of increasing financial strength as President Trump, who tapped into anger about the economy, took office this year.

1/3/2018 4:20 PM
Washington Post? Real news???



heheheheehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehehheeheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheheehehehehehe!!!!!
1/3/2018 6:41 PM
Posted by The Taint on 1/3/2018 9:12:00 PM (view original):
Perhaps you prefer the Wall Street Journal?


https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/06/21/not-just-the-1-the-upper-middle-class-is-larger-and-richer-than-ever/
Can't argue with that. They grew more under Obama and the democrats than ever before. He sure did kiss Wall Streets ***. I wonder what he's gonna get.
1/3/2018 9:44 PM
Posted by The Taint on 12/21/2017 10:48:00 AM (view original):
Let's look at what corporations did the last time there was tax repatriation, in 2004.
The restrictions on dollars coming back via Repatriation in 2004 were:
- Qualified US capital spend: for example Dell built a US-based assembly plant in Virginia (i believe that was the location)
- Contributions to pension funds
- Repurchase of shares
1/4/2018 3:10 PM
Posted by The Taint on 12/21/2017 5:26:00 PM (view original):
but it doesn't help the middle class
Most of the middle-class participate within the stock market through pensions and/or 401k/409b plans --- therefore they will also benefit under this new law
1/4/2018 3:11 PM
Posted by The Taint on 1/3/2018 9:12:00 PM (view original):
Perhaps you prefer the Wall Street Journal?


https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/06/21/not-just-the-1-the-upper-middle-class-is-larger-and-richer-than-ever/
So you believe BHO was a good president? Correct?

Wages stagnant and GDP barely moving. Just making sure.
1/4/2018 3:16 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Posted by sjurat on 1/4/2018 3:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 12/21/2017 10:48:00 AM (view original):
Let's look at what corporations did the last time there was tax repatriation, in 2004.
The restrictions on dollars coming back via Repatriation in 2004 were:
- Qualified US capital spend: for example Dell built a US-based assembly plant in Virginia (i believe that was the location)
- Contributions to pension funds
- Repurchase of shares
Wall Street Journal:

When Congress passed the repatriation tax holiday in 2004, the legislation specified that the funds should be earmarked for activities like hiring workers or conducting research and prohibited using the money for executive compensation or buying back stock. Companies that brought back profits earned abroad saw them taxed at roughly 5%, instead of the top 35% corporate tax rate.

The 15 companies that benefited the most from a 2004 tax break for the return of their overseas profits cut more than 20,000 net jobs and decreased the pace of their research spending, according to report from the Democratic staff of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations released Monday night.

The report warned against repeating the tax break, calling the 2004 effort "a failed tax policy" that cost the U.S. Treasury $3.3 billion in estimated lost revenues over 10 years and led to U.S. companies directing more funds offshore. U.S.-based multinationals often defer bringing back profits earned abroad to avoid paying U.S. taxes on them.

The 15 companies that repatriated the most after the 2004 tax break on the return of overseas profits later cut a net 20,931 jobs between 2004 and 2007 and slightly decreased the pace of their spending on research and development, found the report surveying 19 companies' activity.

1/4/2018 3:51 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 1/4/2018 3:16:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 1/3/2018 9:12:00 PM (view original):
Perhaps you prefer the Wall Street Journal?


https://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/06/21/not-just-the-1-the-upper-middle-class-is-larger-and-richer-than-ever/
So you believe BHO was a good president? Correct?

Wages stagnant and GDP barely moving. Just making sure.
I do think he was a good president and wages have been stagnant since the 1970's. It's a problem that has plagued whoever has been president.

https://hbr.org/2017/10/why-wages-arent-growing-in-america


An article from Fortune about Obama and GDP. It wasn't as bad as the talking points say it was.

http://fortune.com/2017/08/30/donald-trump-springfield-mo-3-gdp/


1/4/2018 4:04 PM
◂ Prev 1...4|5|6|7|8...29 Next ▸
Tax Cuts Consequences Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.