Wow, quite obsessive about me in my absense here.

Of course you should focus on the negative. They're the worst playoff team ever!

*****, moan, complain without merit.

It's what some of you do best.




Christ you're ******** about an exhibition game!!!!

Morons.

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.

Thomas: Stops 37 of 38 shots as the Bruins win 3-1. He throws some punches at JP Dumont for running him over in the crease, leading to a scrum that got the Bruins a 2 man advantage.

They've now won 5 out of 7. Thomas is 5-2 with a 2.33 GAA and a .926 save % in January. Despite the "4th worst shots against", Thomas has begun to steal games by himself. Which EVERY ONE OF YOU has said ad nauseam that he can't do. Because he "flops" and "gives up goals in an exhibition game", you mindlessly bash him.

Yet another "4th liner" has a good game in Metropolit who scores twice. Both of them assisted by Lucic who looked pretty damn solid in the rookies game.

Sturm scores his 17th of the season which leads the team. That's 6 goals in his last 8 games.



Again, I'm a homer and view things through "Black and Gold Glasses" because I look at the positives in these things??

Get over yourselves. Seriously

Midseason==trade deadline?

Not um. halfway through the season?

They've played 50 of 82 games man. Time to stop acting like it's early in the season.

And who the fukk said worldbeaters?

Not ONCE have I said anything you can refute. NOT ONCE.

So just avoid the topic and put words in my mouth. That way you can have the conversation with yourself I guess. I'm done.

Thomas "stole" a game (your words, not mine) against the 10th best team in the Western Conference, a team with a nearly identical record to the Bruins. Yeah, that's a great thing to go on his list of accomplishments tis season.

They've still given up more goals than they've scored. That formula usually doesn't add up to too much success.

Keep drinking the Kool-Aid there Gimpy.

Alright, I lied.

Every single positive thing I say, You'll diminish. You actually took the time to look up the standings of Nashville to make sure the win 'wasn't against anyone good'. That's amazingly sad.

Every needless fukkin nitpick you come up with, it's #1 Valid comment of all time. You will listen to NO reason when it comes to arguing against your little fact, and that is quite obvious.

It's POINTLESS talking to a contrarian, bitter, snobbish person like you about ANY topic, this I'm sure of. If you don't like other people's opinions or facts, you present something else and ignore the rest. It's fine. It's the age of the internet.

Anyone with a keyboard can spend massive amounts of time being negative about EVERYTHING they can find. Those who don't feel that way and look for positives in teams they follow, are "naive" and called "sheep".

Carry on being a negative d!ck to everyone who doesn't look at everything as pessimisticly as possible. I'm sure it's very fulfilling.

In the NHL, there are the two #1 seeds, and then there are 23 friggin teams between 50 and 61 points.

1. * Ottawa 50 66
2. * Philadelphia 48 59
3. * Carolina 52 52
4. Montreal 49 60
5. New Jersey 49 59
6. Pittsburgh 49 58
7. Boston 49 55
8. NY Islanders 50 54
9. NY Rangers 51 54
10. Washington 50 51
11. Atlanta 52 50
12. Florida 51 49
13. Buffalo 48 48
14. Toronto 51 48
15. Tampa Bay 50 45

The teams below Boston are just soooooo much better!! They all have elite goalies and are playing so much better then Boston has been!!! We're doomed!! Pittsburgh won't miss Crosby at all!! Ty "Choke-in" Conklin will continue to be awesome ever since you bashed him!! They can't be caught!

Or, the Bruins have done amazingly well despite their major injuries. They gotten blown out at times by giving up too many shots. AND they've gutted their way to as many wins as ANYONE, including YOU, could have hoped for. They're winning with fillin rookies and scrappy, lower-level-talent players. Instead of having appreciation for their SUCCEEDING, you rant about things you can't change, like the OFFSEASON/PRESEASON ROSTER. They're the THIRD SEED in the East if they're in the Southeast.

Excuse the fukk out of me for thinking them getting healthy AND making a trade to help the offense could bump them UP the standings, instead of the "obvious freefall" you're BANKING ON.

You'll have a whole thread of stupidity to look back on should they even MAKE the playoffs, never mind possibly host a home playoff series.

And of course, if they lose more players, losses pile up, and they do miss the playoffs, you can do imaginary high-fives with your imaginary friends for "being right!!" about a team you supposedly root for.

In fact, after games vs. Ottawa and Detroit back to back (which I'm sure you'll freak out about if they lose both of those), they play the following in February:

Buffalo
@Buffalo
Florida
Carolina
@Pittsburgh
@Toronto
@Carolina
@Florida
@Tampa Bay
Ottawa
Pittsburgh

They play everyone they need to stay ahead of, or catch up to this month. They're in 7th place with 55 points.

End of February, they'll be 5th.

Period.

And that's bullsh!t about "blindly following them".

I'm watching them PLAY THE GAMES!!

You've not said one thing that makes me think you're even watching them!

You look at shot totals and %s only when it helps your cause, and IGNORE intangibles when brought up.

But you're on the "I saw right away" tip still.

It's EASY to say that pre-season. You're sitting here PREDICTING WITHOUT FAIL how they're going to do in the next 30 games when you've been completely incorrect about the 1st 50.

And I'm supposed to "take your word"???

You're spouting OPINIONS and calling them FACTS!

So I'll do the same I guess.

Again I ask, get over yourself. You aren't the endall-beall of all fandom because you rant about the ownership.

I choose to support the PLAYERS who PLAY.

Your ownership agenda and pessimistic excuse for being a fan are NONFACTORS in how they play.

Believe it or not.

Which you said before this month. I GUARANTEE you did.

Again, it'll be here for posterity.

I doubt you'll be discussing much if I'm correct.