WOW 0-12 FOR THE RING REALLY REALLY LOL LOL Topic

zubinsum
Posts: 1731 (0)
Hall of Famer
72
Hall of Famer
<misogyny on> Chicks should not try to play hardball with the guys.<misogyny off>
10/10/2010 9:13 PM (edited)
dahsdebater
Posts: 10036 (0)
Hall of Famer
284 272 18
Pro
My guess is you're subconciously throwing World Series now to "improve" on your record.
10/10/2010 7:58 PM
zubinsum
Posts: 1731 (0)
Hall of Famer
72
Hall of Famer
Posted by amycox67 on 10/10/2010 7:47:00 PM (view original):
Posted by zubinsum on 10/10/2010 1:39:00 PM (view original):
<misogyny on> Chicks should try to play hardball with the guys.<misogyny off>
?????? what this mean
 
It was a joke, but not a very good one.
10/10/2010 11:34 PM
thurst63
Posts: 530 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 2 2 1
Prospect
Well at least your rating went back to Hall-of-Famer  Sorry AMY
10/11/2010 8:03 AM
skinndogg
Posts: 1031 (0)
Hall of Famer
148 1 1 208 30
Rookie

There's more to the game than just speed.

10/11/2010 11:08 AM
boogerlips
Posts: 3731 (0)
Hall of Famer
204 45
Hall of Famer
Assuming you have a 47% chance of winning a series.......     .53^12=.05% chance of losing 12 series in a row. Not really any different than a mediocre team losing 12 games in a row during the season. Happens.
10/12/2010 1:12 AM
rleo
Posts: 434 (0)
Hall of Famer
194 1 5 2
Prospect
amy...I thought MY dismal playoff record was bad, (no WS - only 2 or 3 second rounds) but 0-12 in the WS would be REALLY
frustrating.

BTW I don't think 0-12 in series is the same as an 0-12 game streak (not sure of the math, though)
10/12/2010 8:26 AM
llamanunts
Posts: 1498 (0)
Hall of Famer
29 95
Hall of Famer
If only someone had taken the time to display the math, perhaps with the result in boldface.  For shame.
10/12/2010 10:51 AM
boogerlips
Posts: 3731 (0)
Hall of Famer
204 45
Hall of Famer
The Cretins are cloning and feeding.
10/12/2010 11:51 AM
tbar652
Posts: 17 (0)
Rookie
5 1 1
Prospect
Posted by boogerlips on 10/12/2010 1:13:00 AM (view original):
Assuming you have a 47% chance of winning a series.......     .53^12=.05% chance of losing 12 series in a row. Not really any different than a mediocre team losing 12 games in a row during the season. Happens.
Ok let me get this right are you saying losing 12 World Series in a row is about the same as losing 12 games in a row
10/12/2010 12:00 PM
msheaf1
Posts: 480 (0)
Hall of Famer
340 6 4 2
Prospect
Posted by amycox67 on 10/12/2010 4:41:00 PM (view original):
Posted by boogerlips on 10/12/2010 11:51:00 AM (view original):
The Cretins are cloning and feeding.
I dont understand Boogie what you mean hummmm
Amy trust me you don't want to try to understand boogerlips. If you ever do start understanding him be very worried about your mental health.
10/12/2010 5:16 PM
zubinsum
Posts: 1731 (0)
Hall of Famer
72
Hall of Famer

Amy, assuming the chance of winning any game in a series is 50%, the chance of winning the series is 50%.  And if a team had a 50% chance of winning a regular season game, the chance of losing 12 series in a row would be the same as the chance of losing 12 regular season games.

10/13/2010 12:39 AM
crazystengel
Posts: 11995 (0)
Hall of Famer
687
Hall of Famer
I imagine it's not the same, for the following reasons:

1. 12 game losing streaks are not that common, and don't usually happen to good teams.  A team that's made it all the way to the WS is almost always a good team. 

2. Losing 12 games in a row means you've been swept by a few teams.  It's possible your team has come up against a few consecutive teams that are just flat out better; the chances of a WS team meeting 12 consecutive superior opponents would have to be much lower.  

3.  Losing 7(!) of the 12 series after being up 3-0 is just bizarre.  I've been in 72 World Series.  I've come back from 3-0 once, and never lost after going up 3-0.  To me, those 7 3-0 collapses are even freakier than the 0-12 record.
10/13/2010 1:21 AM
profcake
Posts: 2062 (0)
Hall of Famer
161
Pro
I would like to think that my success in the WS has been to skill, but I think zubinsum is right about the odds.  I guess I am just on the other end of it.  My streak of 9 for 9 (13 for 13 with TOCs) might come to a close real soon.  Im tied 3-3 facing Milacki in game 7.  I'll see if my luck runs through. 
10/13/2010 1:25 AM
llamanunts
Posts: 1498 (0)
Hall of Famer
29 95
Hall of Famer
Posted by crazystengel on 10/13/2010 1:22:00 AM (view original):
I imagine it's not the same, for the following reasons:

1. 12 game losing streaks are not that common, and don't usually happen to good teams.  A team that's made it all the way to the WS is almost always a good team. 

2. Losing 12 games in a row means you've been swept by a few teams.  It's possible your team has come up against a few consecutive teams that are just flat out better; the chances of a WS team meeting 12 consecutive superior opponents would have to be much lower.  

3.  Losing 7(!) of the 12 series after being up 3-0 is just bizarre.  I've been in 72 World Series.  I've come back from 3-0 once, and never lost after going up 3-0.  To me, those 7 3-0 collapses are even freakier than the 0-12 record.
Agree on #3.

Disagree on #1.  While a team that's made it all the way to the WS is almost always a good team, the same is true of its opponent.

10/13/2010 9:47 AM
12 Next ▸
WOW 0-12 FOR THE RING REALLY REALLY LOL LOL Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.