I don't think this article was written for me, because I still don't buy that progressives are in bed with the corporations.
There's also some lines that presupposes ideas that I still don't buy, like this
Yet, in this cultural revolution, the fickleness of its dominant ideas is an essential feature, not a bug. The point of this “totalitarianism” is not to force everyone to think correct thoughts at the risk of getting fired; it is to get them fired. Full stop. Like the medieval guilds of old Europe, surplus managers are threatened by the existence of a mass of people willing to do any job within their ambit that cannot be comfortably accommodated without inviting the pauperization of their entire profession. For the medieval guilds, guaranteeing that only a select few who could actually hope to become carpenters or glove makers had nothing to do with improving the economic efficiency of the towns, but rather to secure the living standards and social status of those carpenters and glove makers already in practice.
I don't think this is happening en masse. The article does not prove that this is happening en masse.
"Woke" corporations look bad for the left; I don't deny that. But this does not prove that people like Bernie and AOC are working with the elites. Like I said earlier, what are these companies actually doing to boost the left besides vague, hypocritical support of civil rights? Even "big tech" bans the left all the time. There's still been zero evidence presented that big tech has a huge left bias.
If your argument is that moderate liberals like Pelosi and Biden are guilty of this, that's fine. I agree.
We can also have a conversation about why some workers are moving towards the GOP. I would argue that they're being duped, and I'm weary of arguments that shift messaging away from the truth just to pander to more people.