When the Supreme Court rules in favor of Texas and the election is overturned and Trump is declared the rightful winner, it will be the left and not the right calling for Civil War and secession. Note the rhetoric of the left now and watch how it (might) change. Personally, given that these states wildly changed their voting procedures mere months before a national election I think it's likely that Texas, led by a brilliant Cruz missile, wins. Very historic times we are living through, my friends.

Do you want to put money on it?

Not much of a legal scholar are you??

#1. Brilliant and Ted Cruz have no business being in the same sentence..........even State.
#2. You can cry "damage" all you want and (in many cases) even HAVE legitimate damage BUT you need standing to sue.
a. Without legal "standing" under Law, you have no claim.
#3. Texas, (nor ANY other State) has no standing or ability to object to some other State's election procedures. (Assuming no provable fraud, etc)
#4. When damaged, and with standing, you still must have credibility. You can't be arbitrary and capricious in your claim, asserting damages against this Party to the suit, and excepting other Party's who use (and supposedly Damage the Plaintiff) the same exact methods you claim damage you in their OWN election practices.
#5 Your Lawsuit must be "timely".
a. You can't "wait and see" how the practice you object to turns out and THEN (because it doesn't turn out How YOU like) file Legal objection. That isn't legally "timely".

The whole concept of claiming the COURTS should step in and OVERTURN some State results while allowing other State results to stand when multiple States used vastly similar results with some States overwhelmingly voting in favor of Rep's (like UTAH---an all mail ballot state!) and other States voting Democrat is laughable. IF IT weren't so downright treasonous to suggest and support. It goes against EVERY aspect of our Free and fair democratic elections!!

Shame on you IF you're seriously suggesting this Garbage is supportable.
IF SO, I would treat YOU as an ENEMY of the State!

GG, don't you have anything else to do? Get a life, dude.

Posted by wylie715 on 12/10/2020 12:22:00 PM (view original):
GG, don't you have anything else to do? Get a life, dude.

Trolling from my mama's basement is the best life, dog.

Posted by laramiebob on 12/10/2020 11:59:00 AM (view original):
Not much of a legal scholar are you??

#1. Brilliant and Ted Cruz have no business being in the same sentence..........even State.
#2. You can cry "damage" all you want and (in many cases) even HAVE legitimate damage BUT you need standing to sue.
a. Without legal "standing" under Law, you have no claim.
#3. Texas, (nor ANY other State) has no standing or ability to object to some other State's election procedures. (Assuming no provable fraud, etc)
#4. When damaged, and with standing, you still must have credibility. You can't be arbitrary and capricious in your claim, asserting damages against this Party to the suit, and excepting other Party's who use (and supposedly Damage the Plaintiff) the same exact methods you claim damage you in their OWN election practices.
#5 Your Lawsuit must be "timely".
a. You can't "wait and see" how the practice you object to turns out and THEN (because it doesn't turn out How YOU like) file Legal objection. That isn't legally "timely".

The whole concept of claiming the COURTS should step in and OVERTURN some State results while allowing other State results to stand when multiple States used vastly similar results with some States overwhelmingly voting in favor of Rep's (like UTAH---an all mail ballot state!) and other States voting Democrat is laughable. IF IT weren't so downright treasonous to suggest and support. It goes against EVERY aspect of our Free and fair democratic elections!!

Shame on you IF you're seriously suggesting this Garbage is supportable.
IF SO, I would treat YOU as an ENEMY of the State!

Ted Cruz went to Harvard. Did you?

Wouldn't go near the place. The right wingers say it's full of "commies".............Maybe they's right.
Besides I don't go east of the Big Muddy.

Posted by Guitarguy567 on 12/10/2020 1:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 12/10/2020 11:59:00 AM (view original):
Not much of a legal scholar are you??

#1. Brilliant and Ted Cruz have no business being in the same sentence..........even State.
#2. You can cry "damage" all you want and (in many cases) even HAVE legitimate damage BUT you need standing to sue.
a. Without legal "standing" under Law, you have no claim.
#3. Texas, (nor ANY other State) has no standing or ability to object to some other State's election procedures. (Assuming no provable fraud, etc)
#4. When damaged, and with standing, you still must have credibility. You can't be arbitrary and capricious in your claim, asserting damages against this Party to the suit, and excepting other Party's who use (and supposedly Damage the Plaintiff) the same exact methods you claim damage you in their OWN election practices.
#5 Your Lawsuit must be "timely".
a. You can't "wait and see" how the practice you object to turns out and THEN (because it doesn't turn out How YOU like) file Legal objection. That isn't legally "timely".

The whole concept of claiming the COURTS should step in and OVERTURN some State results while allowing other State results to stand when multiple States used vastly similar results with some States overwhelmingly voting in favor of Rep's (like UTAH---an all mail ballot state!) and other States voting Democrat is laughable. IF IT weren't so downright treasonous to suggest and support. It goes against EVERY aspect of our Free and fair democratic elections!!

Shame on you IF you're seriously suggesting this Garbage is supportable.
IF SO, I would treat YOU as an ENEMY of the State!

Ted Cruz went to Harvard. Did you?

They had a quota for right wing racists.

What kind of man does so much for a person who insulted and humiliated his wife and called his father a co - conspirator of Oswald.

an absolute bum.

NUFF said.

Posted by Guitarguy567 on 12/10/2020 1:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 12/10/2020 11:59:00 AM (view original):
Not much of a legal scholar are you??

#1. Brilliant and Ted Cruz have no business being in the same sentence..........even State.
#2. You can cry "damage" all you want and (in many cases) even HAVE legitimate damage BUT you need standing to sue.
a. Without legal "standing" under Law, you have no claim.
#3. Texas, (nor ANY other State) has no standing or ability to object to some other State's election procedures. (Assuming no provable fraud, etc)
#4. When damaged, and with standing, you still must have credibility. You can't be arbitrary and capricious in your claim, asserting damages against this Party to the suit, and excepting other Party's who use (and supposedly Damage the Plaintiff) the same exact methods you claim damage you in their OWN election practices.
#5 Your Lawsuit must be "timely".
a. You can't "wait and see" how the practice you object to turns out and THEN (because it doesn't turn out How YOU like) file Legal objection. That isn't legally "timely".

The whole concept of claiming the COURTS should step in and OVERTURN some State results while allowing other State results to stand when multiple States used vastly similar results with some States overwhelmingly voting in favor of Rep's (like UTAH---an all mail ballot state!) and other States voting Democrat is laughable. IF IT weren't so downright treasonous to suggest and support. It goes against EVERY aspect of our Free and fair democratic elections!!

Shame on you IF you're seriously suggesting this Garbage is supportable.
IF SO, I would treat YOU as an ENEMY of the State!

Ted Cruz went to Harvard. Did you?

and GW Bush went to Yale. Doesn't mean a thing.

Posted by DougOut on 12/10/2020 6:11:00 PM (view original):
Cruz hates white people?

cruz is a 50s greaser

of course he hates white people

cruz love is why tesla moved to tejas

Posted by Guitarguy567 on 12/10/2020 11:00:00 AM (view original):
When the Supreme Court rules in favor of Texas and the election is overturned and Trump is declared the rightful winner, it will be the left and not the right calling for Civil War and secession. Note the rhetoric of the left now and watch how it (might) change. Personally, given that these states wildly changed their voting procedures mere months before a national election I think it's likely that Texas, led by a brilliant Cruz missile, wins. Very historic times we are living through, my friends.

WRONG YET AGAIN!!!

SCOTUS just rejected the lawsuit.

Makes sense that you were too much of a coward to actually put money on it.

"The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of
complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of
the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially
cognizable interest in the manner in which another State
conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed
as moot."

THAT'S GREAT NEWS! NOW THE DEMS HAVE NO REASON TO PACK THE COURT! HOORAY!