So you believe WifS should set a new precedent and give users their team back if they fail to renew? Do you have a timeframe in mind?

And by "timeframe", I mean how quickly must WifS act to make this happen?

LMFAO

Posted by therewas47 on 4/18/2017 11:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 4/18/2017 11:09:00 AM (view original):
LOL.

You seem like a good user. What is your opinion of the issue with Indiana in wooden?

Since this is my alias, I think WifS made the right call. You have at least a month to renew. After that, your rehire is subject to the hiring process. No exceptions to avoid setting a new precedent.

you're going to wake up site staff if you keep doing that. They're busy reviewing the early entry problem.

Posted by therewas47 on 4/18/2017 11:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 4/18/2017 11:09:00 AM (view original):
LOL.

You seem like a good user. What is your opinion of the issue with Indiana in wooden?

Actually, I agree with Mike. Establishing precedents often invites headaches to follow ("you did it for him, why won't you do it for me?").

I often deal with having to enforce policies (some I agree with strongly, some I disagree with strongly) in my day-to-day work life. Avoiding exceptions and not establishing precedents is something I'm quite familiar with. If you've ever dealt with internal (or worse yet, external) auditors, you'd understand why.

Well, this thread won't last long...